Judgment[1993] KECA 64
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU (Coram: Apaloo CJ, Gachuhi & Omolo JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 75 OF 1991 NAIROBI BUS UNION………………….. APPELLANT VERSUS DEXTER IRERI IMANENE ……...…… RESPONDENT (Appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Eldoret (Mr Justice KKS Aganyanya) dated 24th May, 1989 in HCCC NO 74 OF 1987)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MERU CIVIL CASE NO 390 OF 1992(OS) KIBUNDI …………….…………….… PLAINTIFF VERSUS MUKOBWA & ANOTHER ….….... DEFENDANT RULING This is a preliminary question as to whether, by reason of the determination of the originating summons by the High Court, in the High Court Civil Case No 2411 of 1979 (OS), at Nairobi, the instant originating summons, which was also started at Nairobi but in due course was transferred here, is barred by the application of the doctrine of
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET CIVIL SUIT NO 142 OF 1989 THOMAS NYAIBURU NYAKANGO ………….……. PLAINTIFF VERSUS DIAMOND TRUST OF KENYA LTD…………..… DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU (Coram: Gicheru, Muli & Omolo JJ A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 68 OF 1993 JATANI……………….… APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC……………RESPONDENT (Appeal from a conviction and sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Lady Justice R Nambuye) dated 26th November, 1992 in HC CR A No 387 of 1992)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET CIVIL APPEAL NO 11 OF 1992 SECURICOR COURIER (K) LTD………....…. APPELLANT VERSUS OWINO……………………………………..
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 176 OF 1992 JOSEPH KOECH YEGO …....…….…………. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…….………………………….… RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
There is no difficulty in complying with an order to that effect. It was a prayer for an order allowing the applicant to manifest her religion by doing a specific and clear act, namely, wearing her headscarf.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA AT THE COURT OF APPEAL IN NAKURU CRIMINAL APPEAL 16 OF 1991 SIMON MARUTIT ………..……………….. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ……………………………….RESPONDENT (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya Nakuru (Tanui, J.