Judgment[1992] KEHC 27
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Commercial and TaxInsolvency Cause
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: NYARANGI, MASIME & COCKAR JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 111 OF 1990 PAUL JOSEPH NGEI …………………...…… APPELLANT VERSUS OFFICIAL RECEIVER……………..….……. RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Ruling and Order of the High Court at Nairobi (Akiwumi J) dated 14th June 1990 in High Court Bankruptcy Cause No 14 of 1988)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Civil Case 6153 of 1992 Locus standi – rate payers – whether a rate payer has sufficient interest to challenge in court the action of a public body whose expenses he contributes – Judicial Review – public authorities – whether public authorities are accountable to a court of law for the lawfulness of their action The applicants are two Nairobi residents and rate payers. They have instituted the present action against the 1st re
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 3086 OF 1989 ROBERT LETAPIN OLE KIDOTU...........................PLAINTIFF VERSUS STEPHEN MUIRURI...........................................RESPONDENT RULING The objector herein, Loise Njoki Murathi seeks release of a motor vehicle, KZZ 658 attached at the instance of the plaintiff herein, Mr Kidotu for a debt owed by the defendant Mr Muiruri who is the husband of the objector. The application is supported by an affidavit swo
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIG COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 1428 OF 1990 LEONARD SOLOO RINGOS ......................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.....................................................RESPONDENT (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No 1685 of 1986 of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Nakuru: O G Githinji: Esq)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 182 OF 1991 NGANGA GICHURI .............................................1ST PLAINTIFF DAVID KIHANYA NGANGA ................................2ND PLAINTIFF VERSUS NDUNGU NGANGA..................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Gachuhi, Gicheru & Cockar JJ A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 89 OF 1990 BETWEEN PETER LEO BARAZA..............................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................RESPONDENT (An Appeal from the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Potter & Mbaluto, JJ) dated the 27th day of July, 1990 in HCCrA No 1995 of 1988) **********************
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CRIMINAL CASE NO.44 OF 1991 TOM PIEMO OMBURA …………) SHIKUDHANI AJWANG RUMAYA ………………. ACCUSEDS VERSUS REPUBLIC ………………… ………………… ……….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 4988 OF 1992 DP & OTHERS...........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KENYA TIMES MEDIA TRUST LTD.......................DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiffs have brought this suit against the defendants for libel. The plaintiffs obtained a temporary exparte injunction restraining the defendant, one of the national dailies, from repeating the publication of the alleged defamatory matter or of similar
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 913 OF 1989 PETER MUSABI KIHINGU...........................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC..................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Criminal Appeal 5 of 1992 FRANCIS NGIGI GATHUGU ………………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………………………………………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 581 OF 1988 HECO UBERSEEHANDEL.......................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS MAC’S PHARMACEUTICALS LTD ....................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI DIVORCE CAUSE NO 37 OF 1990 A K ...........................................PETITIONER VERSUS Z N K......................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Winding Up Cause 30 of 1989 M Weiss Ltd v The Companies Act(Cap 486) Ruling. This is an application by way of Chamber Summons under the provisions of Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, inherent jurisdiction of the court, the Winding Up rules and all enabling provisions of law for orders that the petition be struck out on the grounds that it is in breach of 10 of the Winding Up rules and S.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 169 OF 1990 NAGIGI MARIGA..............................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.........................................RESPONDENT (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No 198 of 1990 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi O G Githinji)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 3102 OF 1988 WATSON MOGERE .............................................PLAINTIFF BENJAMIN OMWANWA.......................................PLAINTIFF FRANCIS KIBORE................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS EAST AFRICAN BUILDING SOCIETY...............DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Commercial and TaxCase number Bankruptcy Cause
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Bankruptcy Cause 5 of 1989 Wandiema ...................................................................................................... APPLICANT VERSUS Barclays Bank of Kenya Ltd ..............................................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
will decree costs in favour of the defendant. In those circumstances, is there really any basis for an order for security of costs?
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 359 OF 1991 MARTHA WANGARI NJOKA...................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
will decree costs in favour of the defendant. In those circumstances, is there really any basis for an order for security of costs?
Division and case type: CriminalMiscellaneous Criminal Application
accused persons for trial his Court had become functus officio and could not make any further order thereon. While hearing this constitutional issue, it was submitted before us that after the magistrate committed the accused persons for trial to the High Court counsel tried to draw the learned Chief Magistrate’s attention to the irregularities committed, namely non-compliance with provisions of sections 231 up to 253 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but to no avail due to the hostile attitude hel