Judgment[1992] KECA 35
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU CORAM: MASIME, GICHERU & KWACH, JJ.A. 67 OF 1992 BETWEEN EVANS MOSES SAETA ...................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................RESPONDENT (An appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Tanui, J) dated 24th October, 1991 in H.C.CR.A.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU CORAM: MASIME, GICHERU & KWACH, JJ.A. 67 OF 1992 BETWEEN EVANS MOSES SAETA ...................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................RESPONDENT (An appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Tanui, J) dated 24th October, 1991 in H.C.CR.A.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU Criminal Appeal 7 of 1991 JOSHUA LIYAYI MUSUNGU ……….....……….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ………..………………………….… RESPONDENT (Appeal from a sentence of the High Court of Kenya Kakamega (Mr Justice Osiemo) dated 15th October, 1990, In H.C.CR.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Gachuhi, Gicheru & Cockar JJ A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 89 OF 1990 BETWEEN PETER LEO BARAZA..............................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................RESPONDENT (An Appeal from the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Potter & Mbaluto, JJ) dated the 27th day of July, 1990 in HCCrA No 1995 of 1988) **********************
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU Criminal Appeal 37 of 1992 JOSEPH KIPTURGOT A TOWET……………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………….………………………………….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU Criminal Appeal 37 of 1992 JOSEPH KIPTURGOT A TOWET……………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………….………………………………….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Criminal Appeal 5 of 1992 FRANCIS NGIGI GATHUGU ………………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………………………………………….
Division and case type: CriminalMiscellaneous Criminal Application
accused persons for trial his Court had become functus officio and could not make any further order thereon. While hearing this constitutional issue, it was submitted before us that after the magistrate committed the accused persons for trial to the High Court counsel tried to draw the learned Chief Magistrate’s attention to the irregularities committed, namely non-compliance with provisions of sections 231 up to 253 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but to no avail due to the hostile attitude hel
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Court had analysed this evidence in depth, they would most probably have come to the same conclusion as we have. As a result of this, we consider the convictions of these three appellants to be unsafe and should not be allowed to stand.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Criminal Appeal 1 of 1991 ALI SHABAN ………………………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ……………………….…………..