Search court decisions

…The defendant’s advocate was allowed to withdraw from acting for his client on account of lack of adequate or appropriate instructions.…

…The defendant’s advocate had failed to alert his client of the consequences of delay in giving him instructions for filing a defence.…

…herein with concurrence of the advocates for the defendant be set aside.…

…Instead, the notice of change of advocate herein dated 24th January 1990 was signed by M/S. Arum and Company Advocates.…

…There is in the Bankruptcy Notice no 10 file notice of appointment by the debtors advocates filed on 8/10/90 and also a letter by the Debtors advocates dated 15/10/90 asking for copies of the pleadings for service and action…

…The same advocates filed fresh appearance and Notice of appointment in his Bankruptcy Cause on 18/2/91 – four days after the receiving order was given.…

…As to the payment of the preliminary deposit, the respondents paid to the common advocate Kshs 70,000/- being 10% of the purchase price and the common advocate paid to the appellant a sum of Kshs 10,000/- at the request of…

…There was no evidence from the common advocate to show that the Sale Agreement was complied with up to the completion date.…

…On the following day, the defendant’s filed an application in court by way of chamber summons through M/s Mukira Mbaya & Co Advocates in which they sought among other orders, that the ex-parte judgment obtained against them…

…It is easy to explain how the appearance and defence filed by M/s Mukira Mbaya & Co Advocates on behalf of the defendants were never in the court file while the learned magistrate delivered her ex-parte judgment on 29th of…

…Distress for Rent Act 1737 [UK] section 18 Advocates Miss Nguku for the Plaintiff. March 5, 1991, Githinji J delivered the following Ruling.…

…According to that document which his dated 2/6/88, the tenant took possession of the premises on 2/6/88 “subject to the terms and conditions of the lease to be drawn up by the landlord’s advocates”.…

…Civil Procedure Act (cap 21) sections 3A, 75(1) Advocates Mr Juma for the Applicant Mr C B Gor for the Respondent August 29, 1991, the following Judgement of the Court was delivered.…

…The application for leave to appeal against Shields J’s decision was opposed by Mr C B Gor, the advocate for the respondent and original plaintiff.…

…Companies Act (cap 486) section 401 Advocates Mr Shah for the Defendant/ Applicant. Mr Nanji for the Plaintiff/ Respondent. February 5, 1991, Wambilyangah J delivered the following Judgment.…

…Statutes Traffic Act (cap 403) sections 46, 47, 49 Advocates Mrs Ondieki for the Respondent. May 29, 1991, the following Judgment of the Court was delivered.…

…Statutes Penal Code (cap 63) sections 278, 322(2) Advocates Marwa for the 1s & 2nd Appellants. Mr Gumo for the Respondent. April 11, 1991, Patel J delivered the following Judgment.…

…Luntz, H (1983) Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury & Death Sydney: Butterworths 2nd Edn p419 Statutes Fatal Accidents Act (cap 32) section 4(1) Advocates Mr Pandya for the Appellant.…

…Registered Land Act (cap 300) section 143(1) Advocates Mr Khakula for the Appellant Mr Bwonwonga for the Republic/Respondent March 13, 1991, the following Judgment of the Court was delivered.…

…Statutes Criminal Procedure Code (cap 75) section 123(3) Advocates Dr Khaminwa for the Applicant. May 9, 1991, Porter J delivered the following Ruling. This is a further application for bail by Gitobu Imanyara.…