Judgment[1990] KEHC 75
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…………………..APPLICANT VERSUS MACHARIA & ANOTHER………………… RESPONDENT RULING By a Chamber Summons dated 17th but filed in court on 18th May, 1990 the applicants as defendants in the suit pray, for an order vacating the order in injunction…
…The ex parte order of injunction was made after hearing the plaintiff who was the applicant. The present applicants who were the respondents had notice of the date, place and time the application was to be heard.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…(e) An injunction restraining the bank from allowing her so to do...”…
…What would be the effect of granting the injunction?…
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionCivil Suit
…Whether or not to grant an injunction is in the discretion of the court. The discretion is a free one but must be judicially exercised. It must be based on commonsense and legal principles.…
…Secondly, that unless granted an injunction he is likely to suffer injury incapable of adequate redress by an award of damages.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…The plaintiffs therefore sought the following reliefs: a declaration that the resolution of the Governing Council terminating their membership of the Chamber is null and void; an injunction restraining the Chamber from acting…
…I must now revert to the rules that guide the granting of injunctions.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The plaintiff prayed for judgment against the defendants jointly and severally for: a temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from alienating, disposing off the land or registering any instrument or transaction over…