Judgment[1989] KEHC 2
Maathai v Kenya Times Media Trust Ltd
High Court at NairobiCase number Civil Appeal 5403 of 1989
CivilCivil Appeal
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
CivilCivil Appeal
made under Order VI rule 13. Mr Ombaka said the reference to the order was unnecessary because it related to summary procedure.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
made under Order VI rule 13. Mr Ombaka said the reference to the order was unnecessary because it related to summary procedure.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Nyarangi, Gicheru & Kwach, JJA ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 17 OF 1989 Between CLAY GODWIN WAMBULWA............................ APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.........................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
d/o Umedram Bhagwan Pandya, (Mena) he thereby waived his right to rely on limitation under Order XXIII Civil Procedure Rules, by dint of the provisions of section 39 (1)(b) of the Limitation of Actions Act. In his view estoppel can be raised in limine, and urged me to hold that the defendant is estopped from relying on limitation under Order XXIII Civil Procedure Rules, a defence he had waived.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
That evidence so far as it was adduced by the respondent fell foul of the requirements of rule 5 of Order 75: it failed to establish that the appellant was “the relevant “person”. The upshot of that is that the High Court did not have admiralty jurisdiction and the respondent was not entitled to invoke that jurisdiction.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (Coram: Gachuhi, Nyarangi & Gicheru JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 16 OF 1989 MAKALA MAILU MUMENDE ........................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NYALI GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB....................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Masime, Gicheru & Kwach JJ A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 74 OF 1989 Between PETER MBURU KANGETHE................................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.............................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 60 OF 1989 BETWEEN DAVID MAINA...................................................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.............................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: Commercial and TaxCase number Winding Up Cause
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) WINDING UP CAUSE 43 OF 1988 IN THE MATTER OF MAGNUM INTERNATIONAL LTD AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT (CAP. Mr Khaminwa has applied under Section 228 of the Companies Act (hereinafter called the Act) that notwithstanding that Magnum International Limited (hereinafter called the Company) had been ordered to be wound up by an order of the Court made on 26th June, 1989, the Company may be at liberty to commence p
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 364 OF 1989 BETWEEN MALINGI KATANA MALINGI................................. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC................................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 1152 OF 1988 BETWEEN ALI............................................................... APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC..............................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI crim app 75 of 90 KARIUKI………………………APPELLANT V REPUBLIC………………..…….RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Editorial Note Section 3(1) of the Judicature Act was erroneously cited as section 3(3) in the original judgment. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Nyarangi, Masime & Kwach JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO 29 OF 1989 ALITALIA AIRLINES ...........................APPELLANT VERSUS SHAKA ZULU ASSEGAI....................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
On the prepondrance of evidence before me as a whole, I cannot help reaching the inescapable conclusion on such evidence, that the 2nd Defendant was not an innocent purchaser for value of the shit land. I am satisfied that it has been established on a balance of probabilities that he was very much aware when he entered into a written agreement with the 1st Defendant (Exhibit A) on the 5th of October, 1987 for the purchase of the suit land that the said land had then been sold to the Plaintiff wh
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) WINDING UP CAUSE 36 OF 1989 IN THE MATTER OF TURTLE BAY HOTELS LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT RULING. By a Petition presented on 31st August, 1989 Fitzval Remedios Santana De Souza (herein after called the Applicant) has prayed for certain reliefs under Section 211 of the Companies Act and alternatively that the Company namely Turtle Bay Hotels Limited (herein after called the Company ) be wound
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 686 OF 1986 MOSES WAITHANJI MINGIRE……………………PLAINTIFF VERSUS ATTORNEY GENERAL……………………………DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Mwaniki v Republic (Criminal Appeal 62 of 1989) [1989] KECA 64 (KLR) (14 August 1989) (Judgment) Mwaniki v Republic[1989] eKLR Neutral citation: [1989] KECA 64 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL 62 OF 1989 JO NYARANGI, JE GICHERU & RO KWACH, JJA AUGUST 14, 1989 BETWEEN MWANIKI ...................................................................................................... ACCUSED AND REPUBLIC ............................................................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEALS NOS 976 & 977 OF 1986 (CONSOLIDATED) BETWEEN KINYANJUI & 2 OTHERS............................. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC......................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Kagiri v Republic (Criminal Appeal 18 of 1988) [1989] KECA 68 (KLR) (31 July 1989) (Judgment) Kagiri v Republic[1989] eKLR Neutral citation: [1989] KECA 68 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MALINDI CRIMINAL APPEAL 18 OF 1988 JRO MASIME, JE GICHERU & RO KWACH, JJA JULY 31, 1989 BETWEEN DAVID MBUA KAGIRI .......................................................................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ..................................................................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 414 OF 1985 KANTABEN NEMCHAND SHAH ………..……. PLAINTIFF VERSUS APOLLO BWONYA ORODHO RINAH ORODHO BWONYA EDWARD CHARLES OHARE ………………DEFENDANTS