Judgment[1989] KEHC 77
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…The plaintiff spent money to get the services of an advocate, had to go to Makupa and Central Police Stations in connection with the 3rd defendant’s threats to eject them and because of that PW 3 had to suspend what he was…
…The plaintiff did not in any case indicate in her evidence, nor did her son, the amount they spent in that regard. In any case costs of the proceedings before the Tribunal were costs in the cause.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…The learned trial Magistrate seems to have been impressed by the fact that the statement was long and detailed, and could not have been invented by anyone else that the 2nd accused, unless, we add, that person had spent many…
…The learned trial Magistrate was satisfied that the evidence called by the prosecution was sufficient to negative his explanation, and indeed the alibi he put forward, that he spent a normal day carrying passengers, and we…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The appellant was also not happy with the respondent’s behaviour during the latter part of 1985 and early 1986 when the respondent spent most of her time at her farm 10 miles out of Eldoret Town.…