Judgment[1989] KEHC 108
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…fact that the parties had agreed to a sum and that agreement is manifested by the signing of the cheque shows that the plaintiff is entitled to recover that sum unless, as I say, there are some special considerations as fraud…
…The court was in effect saying that a cheque or any bill of exchange constitutes an agreement which may only be vitiated on grounds weighty enough to vitiate any ordinary contract, such as fraud, duress and misrepresentation…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The other act of fraud in the particulars of fraud is said to be that the defendant had no permission of any sort from the plaintis to convert the plaintis’ contract.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…It follows that we nd no merit in the appellant’s persistence in challenging the nding that he was involved in the fraud. 4. It remains, however, to make one clarication.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…counsel for the Plaintiff submitted that the speed within which the land was sold to the 2nd Defendant and transacted through the lands office was reflecting the actions of a man who was aware that he was committing some fraud…