Judgment[1989] KECA 17
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Nyarangi, Gicheru & Kwach, JJA ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 17 OF 1989 Between CLAY GODWIN WAMBULWA............................ APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.........................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
That evidence so far as it was adduced by the respondent fell foul of the requirements of rule 5 of Order 75: it failed to establish that the appellant was “the relevant “person”. The upshot of that is that the High Court did not have admiralty jurisdiction and the respondent was not entitled to invoke that jurisdiction.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (Coram: Gachuhi, Nyarangi & Gicheru JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 16 OF 1989 MAKALA MAILU MUMENDE ........................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NYALI GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB....................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Masime, Gicheru & Kwach JJ A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 74 OF 1989 Between PETER MBURU KANGETHE................................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.............................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI crim app 75 of 90 KARIUKI………………………APPELLANT V REPUBLIC………………..…….RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Editorial Note Section 3(1) of the Judicature Act was erroneously cited as section 3(3) in the original judgment. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Nyarangi, Masime & Kwach JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO 29 OF 1989 ALITALIA AIRLINES ...........................APPELLANT VERSUS SHAKA ZULU ASSEGAI....................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Mwaniki v Republic (Criminal Appeal 62 of 1989) [1989] KECA 64 (KLR) (14 August 1989) (Judgment) Mwaniki v Republic[1989] eKLR Neutral citation: [1989] KECA 64 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL 62 OF 1989 JO NYARANGI, JE GICHERU & RO KWACH, JJA AUGUST 14, 1989 BETWEEN MWANIKI ...................................................................................................... ACCUSED AND REPUBLIC ............................................................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Kagiri v Republic (Criminal Appeal 18 of 1988) [1989] KECA 68 (KLR) (31 July 1989) (Judgment) Kagiri v Republic[1989] eKLR Neutral citation: [1989] KECA 68 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MALINDI CRIMINAL APPEAL 18 OF 1988 JRO MASIME, JE GICHERU & RO KWACH, JJA JULY 31, 1989 BETWEEN DAVID MBUA KAGIRI .......................................................................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ..................................................................................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (Coram: Masime, J.A., Gicheru & Kwach, Ag. JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Ako v Special District Commissioner Kisumu & another (Civil Appeal 27 of 1989) [1989] KECA 50 (KLR) (19 June 1989) (Judgment) Ako v Special District Commissioner Kisumu & another [1989]eKLR Neutral citation: [1989] KECA 50 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CIVIL APPEAL 27 OF 1989 JO NYARANGI, JM GACHUHI, JJA & RO KWACH, AG. JA JUNE 19, 1989 BETWEEN AKO ............................................................................................................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram:nyarangi, JA, Gicheru & Kwach, Ag JJA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 167 OF 1988 NYAKENYA......................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC...............................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
the learned Senior Resident Magistrate ruled that the summons had been properly served under Order https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/1989/51/eng@1989-03-14 4 V Rule 12 of the Civil Procedure Rules and dismissed the application. The appellant’s appeal against that ruling was similarly heard and dismissed by the High Court hence this second appeal.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Platt Ja, Gachuhi & Kwach Ag JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 7 OF 1988 MUTHIKE........................................................APPELLANT VERSUS KENYA FILM CORPORATION LTD...............RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Nyarangi, Platt & Kwach Ag JA ) CIVIL APPEAL 11 OF 1986 LALJI T/A VAKKEP BUILDING CONTRACTORS............APPELLANT VERSUS CAROUSEL LIMITED..................................................................RESPONDENT