Judgment[1986] KECA 26
Alexander Nyachiro Marube & another v Republic
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CRIMINAL DIVISIONCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram:Nyarangi, Platt & Apaloo JJA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. ALEXANDER NYACHIRO MARUBE 2.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 532 OF 1986 DOUGLAS KAARIUKI MUNDIA........................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.......................................................................................RESPONDENT RULING In this case the applicant was jointly charged with 6 others at Kiambu Senior Resident Magistrate’s court with malicious damage to property contrary to section 339 (1) of the Penal Code and assau
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
unreasonable to hold that the mere possession of the pistol on this date is sufficient to found a conclusion that the appellant participated in the robbery. Neither the trial magistrate nor the High Court pinpointed the evidence they considered cogent enough to justify the conclusion that the 1st appellant participated in the robbery.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Macharia v Republic High Court, at Nairobi November 17, 1986 Bosire J Criminal Appeal No 455 of 1986 November 17, 1986, Bosire J delivered the following Judgment. The appellant Peter Maina Macharia was convicted of theft contrary to section 275 of the Penal Code, by a second class district magistrate, at Makadara, Nairobi, particulars being that on October 31, 1985 at Mbotela Estate, Nairobi, he stole one motor vehicle side mirror, valued at Kshs 120, the property of Waruguru Karanja (Warugur
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
Kagiri v Republic (Criminal Appeal 18 of 1988) [1989] KECA 68 (KLR) (31 July 1989) (Judgment) Kagiri v Republic[1989] eKLR Neutral citation: [1989] KECA 68 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MALINDI CRIMINAL APPEAL 18 OF 1988 JRO MASIME, JE GICHERU & RO KWACH, JJA JULY 31, 1989 BETWEEN DAVID MBUA KAGIRI .......................................................................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ..................................................................................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Kinuthia v Republic High Court, at Nairobi Mbaluto J Criminal Appeal No 460 of 1986 November 10, 1986 Mbaluto T delivered the following Judgment. Kinuthia The appellant was convicted of theft from a person contrary to section 279 (a) of the Penal Code and sentenced to fourteen months imprisonment plus four strokes.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 1414 OF 1980 JUMA KHAMISI KARIUKI ….…..………………………………..….………PLAINTIFF versus EAST AFRICA INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND GEORGE OKOKO ….….DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI (CORAM: KNELLER, NYARANGI JJA & GACHUHI Ag JA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 105 OF 1985 JAMES NDUHIU MACHARIA ……...…………….……APPELLANT VERSUS MWOTIA MACHARIA ……………………..……….RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Ruling and Order at the High Court at Nyeri, Patel J)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi and Platt, JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 49 OF 1984 BETWEEN ABDALLA HUSSEIN KILO………………………………….……….. APPELLANT AND KOMBO KASSIM OMAR IDA-SA-GODANA RANCHING CO-OP SOCIETY…....……….…RESPONDENTS (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Bhandari, J) dated October 13, 1983 In High Court Civil Case No 26 of 1983) ________________ JUDGMENT OF HANCOX, J A I have had the advantage of reading in draft the judgment of Platt,
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.3923 OF 1985 KIGIKA DEVELOPERS LIMITED.........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION...........................................................DEFENDANT RULING This matter originally came before me on an application to strike out the defence. I struck out the defence but as the action was somewhat unusual I refused to give judgment, but directed that the case be set down for
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.3923 OF 1985 KIGIKA DEVELOPERS LIMITED.........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION...........................................................DEFENDANT RULING This matter originally came before me on an application to strike out the defence. I struck out the defence but as the action was somewhat unusual I refused to give judgment, but directed that the case be set down for
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Kneller, Nyarangi, JJ A and Gachuhi, Ag J A) CIVIL APPEAL 5 OF 1984 BETWEEN BAKSHISH SINGH & BROTHERS ………….………...............…………….. APPELLANTS AND PANAFRIC HOTELS LIMITED ………..…………….....................…………..
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL MISC APPL 136 OF 1986 JOSHUA CHEGE WANYOIKE ……………………………………….….. APPLICANT AND JAMES THIGA MUKURO …………………………..……...…………… RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to serve the record of appeal and the appeal be admitted of time at the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru ( Masime J ) dated December 3, 1983 In High Court Civil Case No 235 of 1982 RULING The applicant was duly served with the notice for the hearing of the application but did not atten
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL MISC APPL 136 OF 1986 JOSHUA CHEGE WANYOIKE ……………………………………….….. APPLICANT AND JAMES THIGA MUKURO …………………………..……...…………… RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to serve the record of appeal and the appeal be admitted of time at the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru ( Masime J ) dated December 3, 1983 In High Court Civil Case No 235 of 1982 RULING The applicant was duly served with the notice for the hearing of the application but did not atten
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
is between one to ten and one to twelve. It is not difficult to arrange well-conducted parades.
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram; Platt, JA (In Chambers) CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 130 OF 1986 ( In the matter of an intended appeal ) BETWEEN LOISE WAINARO WAMITI …………………………...……………….. PETER WAINARO WAMBUNYU ) 2.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
application through an advocate seeking for review of the judgment and prayer for consequential orders after the judgment to be set aside and the case to be heard on merit. The application was grounded on the fact that they being some of the defendants they were not summoned to appear before the arbitration panel and that judgment was given against them and were made to pay costs in a matter which they had not heard.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram:Kneller, Hancox & Nyarangi JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2 OF 1986 BETWEEN MOHAMED MAHMOUD JABANE............................................................APPELLANT AND HIGHSTONE BUTTY TONGOI OLENJA................................................RESPONDENT JUDGMENT OF HANCOX JA.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO'S 608 OF 1985 and 265 OF1986 (CONSOLIDATED) 1. PETER MAINA NDIRANGU.........................................APPELLANTS VERSUS REPUBLIC........................................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
For all the foregoing reasons, then, I would allow the appeal, I would set aside the learned judge’s order striking out the winding up petition and I would order that the petition should proceed to hearing subject to the Rules being complied with. I would not make any order regarding prayer five in the memorandum of appeal as regards the proposed further advertisements, and I agree that the notice of grounds for affirming the decision should be dismissed.