Judgment[1986] KEHC 23
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…If the defendant wishes to resist the enforcement of the settlement of the plaintiff’s claim, it must attack the settlement itself by seeking to show that the settlement was procured by some fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation…
…agreed with sufficient certainty in the same terms on the same subject-matter, then the contract is good, unless and until it is set aside for failure of some condition on which the existence of the contract depends, or for fraud…
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
…The period of the fraud cannot be held against the lay client. I would excuse the period up to May 23, 1986.…
…I have to weigh this with the effect of the fraud and failure to serve the request for proceedings. It is my view that the latter outweighs the earlier indulgence.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
…It follows that we nd no merit in the appellant’s persistence in challenging the nding that he was involved in the fraud. 4. It remains, however, to make one clarication.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Case
…Examples of facts which cannot be perceived by the senses are intention, fraud, good faith and knowledge. Facts can be directly perceived either with or without the intervention of senses.…