Judgment[1986] KECA 25
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…This was not, however, put in cross-examination to any of the police witnesses, and none of those documents were produced, as we would have expected, remembering that the appellant was professionally defended at the trial…
…This was reiterated by P C Thimbu under cross-examination by Mr Azangalala.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
…In the instant case there was no formal refusal to allow the cross-examination but the 2nd appellant was unrepresented.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Under cross-examination, PW 1 he identified Chacha at the parade but not during the robbery. All that meant that PW 2 was the sole identifying witness in so far as Chacha was concerned.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Neither witness was successfully challenged in cross-examination and we think that both the magistrate and the judge were entitled, and indeed right, to find on the complainant’s evidence, as so supported, that Kshs 105,000…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Appeal
…During his cross-examination the 2nd defendant had strongly denied the suggestion made to him that the lorry was coming from the Railway Station roundabout direction and that it was coming from the direction opposite to his…