Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…The appellant was convicted on two counts of unlawful possession of government stores contrary to section 324(2) of the Penal Code (cap 63), and on another count of unlawful possession of Part One Poison contrary to section…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…On May 14, 1982 the appellant was charged before the senior resident magistrate, Meru with the offence of willfully and unlawfully damaging property contrary to section 339(1) of the Penal Code (cap 63).…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…only begetter of this result because had it dismissed Oloo for refusing a transfer in 1977 to Kakamega, at the same rank and salary, and so forth, and he was aggrieved, then he would have had to litigate for damages for unlawful…
…dismissal and to prove it was unlawful, producing the documents about the health of his daughter, and his own, and the need to be right here in Nairobi next door to their irreplaceable medical experts, and then, by the time…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…There was no justification for the assault and the same was unlawful. The court therefore holds that the two plaintiffs were unlawfully assaulted by the first two defendants and they are therefore liable in damages.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…The urging and submission on the last ground of appeal was that the sentence is unlawful.…
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
…debentures; e) they had waived those rights; f) they were in breach of their contracts and acting mala fides in making their demands; g) their demands were null and void for uncertainty so their appointment of the receivers was unlawful…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…debentures; e) they had waived those rights; f) they were in breach of their contracts and acting mala fides in making their demands; g) their demands were null and void for uncertainty so their appointment of the receivers was unlawful…