Search court decisions

…At the time the defendant returned the fungicide to Afrocox their contractual liability was to the plaintiff and they had ceased to have any contractual relationship with Ashford, and it follows with Ashford’s agent Afrocox…

…The defendant is liable to the plaintiff under the contract entered into verbally on August 13, 1985 and confirmed in writing two days later, whatever the rights and liabilities as between the defendant, Afrocox and Ashford…

…Originally the defendant instructed Messrs Bryson Inamdar & Bowyer who filed a defence denying liability.…

…Each of the two defendants filed their written statements of defence denying their liability to the plaintiff but the court need not narrate these defences because when the suit came up for hearing Mr Juma appearing for both…

…the defendants indicated to the court that the defendants have now admitted liability and that the court should only decide the quantum of general and special damages.…

…Each of the two defendants filed their written statements of defence denying their liability to the plaintiff but the court need not narrate these defences because when the suit came up for hearing Mr Juma appearing for both…

…the defendants indicated to the court that the defendants have now admitted liability and that the court should only decide the quantum of general and special damages.…

…in working order it should have been returned to the plaintiff immediately instead of keeping it for more than two years, and then returning it after having it repaired which was an acceptance of both the obligation and liability…

…in working order it should have been returned to the plaintiff immediately instead of keeping it for more than two years, and then returning it after having it repaired which was an acceptance of both the obligation and liability…

…The parties have agreed that subject to the question of liability the quantum of general damages should be Kshs 7,500 for each plaintiff and Kshs 2,105 as special damages for both of them.…

…The defendants admitted liability and hence the only issue before the court is quantum of general damages since special damages have also been agreed at Kshs 8,650.…

…There could not have been a consent judgment if there was no admission of liability. What the defendants really are disputing is the claim for general damages and exemplary damages.…

…Liability was admitted when the appellant’s claims against the respondent came to trial at the end of June 1982. The only issue was the quantum of damages, special and general, the respondent should pay the appellant.…

…Liability was admitted when the appellant’s claims against the respondent came to trial at the end of June 1982. The only issue was the quantum of damages, special and general, the respondent should pay the appellant.…

…This appeal arises from two consolidated cases being Suit No. 4141 and No. 4142 of 1979 which were instituted in the High Court by the respondent (plaintiff) a limited liability company incorporated in Kenya.…

…The Kenindia Assurance Company Limited is a limited liability company incorporated in Kenya.…