Judgment[1985] KECA 33
Joseph Kioko Muoki v Republic
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Madan, Kneller JJA & Platt Ag JA ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 133 OF 1984 Between JOSEPH KIOKO MUOKI..............................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC...................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Nairobi, Aganyanya J)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Kitavi v Cosatal Bottlers Limited Court of Appeal, at Mombasa September 10, 1985 Kneller, Hancox & Nyarangi JJA Civil Appeal No 69 of 1984 (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J) Cases 1. Paris v Stephey Borough Council (No 2) [1951] 1 AER 42 2.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Kitavi v Cosatal Bottlers Limited Court of Appeal, at Mombasa September 10, 1985 Kneller, Hancox & Nyarangi JJA Civil Appeal No 69 of 1984 (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J) Cases 1. Paris v Stephey Borough Council (No 2) [1951] 1 AER 42 2.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Maweu v Kiu Ranching & Farming Cooperative Society Ltd Court of Appeal, at Nairobi September 4, 1985 Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Platt Ag JA Civil Appeal No 2 of 1983 (Appeal from the ruling of the High Court at Nairobi, Porter J) Cases 1. Mwangi Githu v Livingstone Ndeete & Others, Court of Appeal No 4 of 1979 Referred 2.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Karinga v Republic High Court, at Nairobi August 20, 1985 Schofield J Criminal Appeal No 1696 of 1984 (Appeal from the resident magistrate’s court at Kibera, P N Mugo Esq) Advocates Appellant absent, unrepresented and not wishing to be present Miss W. August 20, 1985, Schofield J delivered the following Judgment.
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Gachuhi Ag JA CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 41 OF 1985 Between BATHOLOMEW MUYALE .............................APPLICANT AND SHEM NYAMBASI MULEFU ...........................DEFENDANT ELIJA NANDI CHIKAMAI................................DEFENDANT (In an intended appeal from an order of the High Court at Kakamega, Aganyanya J in Civil Suit No 13 of 1979) *************************
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Gachuhi Ag JA CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 41 OF 1985 Between BATHOLOMEW MUYALE .............................APPLICANT AND SHEM NYAMBASI MULEFU ...........................DEFENDANT ELIJA NANDI CHIKAMAI................................DEFENDANT (In an intended appeal from an order of the High Court at Kakamega, Aganyanya J in Civil Suit No 13 of 1979) *************************
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Attorney General v Saeed High Court, at Mombasa July 29, 1985 Aragon J Civil Case No 584 of 1977 July 29, 1985, Aragon J delivered the following Ruling. This is an application by Messrs A Y A Jiwaji & Jiwaji who are now acting for the defendant for dismissal of this suit for want of prosecution.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: KNELLER, HANCOX & NYARANGI JJA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 177 OF 1984 BETWEEN KARIUKI & ANOTHER .................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC......................................
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 772 OF 1984 AURORA BAKING COMPANY (1975) LTD………………PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT AND PHENNTHA WANINGI AND 3 OTHERS………….DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS RULING By an order of this court dated 19.11.84 the hearing of the plaintiff’s/applicant’s application filed in this court on 13.11.84 was stood over to 8.1.85 before the Duty Judge and the caveat lodged in respect of L R No.10445/3 situated in Nyandarua District was extended pending the disposa
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionMiscellaneous Criminal Application
tends as a direction to the Court hearing the application for Order of Prohibition to grant the Order without using its own discretion whether it should do so. The Attorney-General did not need any authority, nor a reminder, that in the light of the opinions expressed by the Constitutional Court he could terminate the proceedings even when coupled with a wet hope that he would do so.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
proceedings and the amendment of the pleadings, and the position in the instant case is governed by order 1 rule 10. At the time the name of the present defendant was added the plaintiff had lost the right to sue her.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
surrendered under a white flag. I therefore reduce his sentence to three years imprisonment.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KUSUMU (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Platt Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 143 OF 1983 Between ANGUKO......................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Kisumu, Schofield J)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KUSUMU (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Platt Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 143 OF 1983 Between ANGUKO......................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Kisumu, Schofield J)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Amigo v Republic Court of Appeal, at Kisumu June 21, 1985 Hancox JA, Platt & Gachuhi Ag JJA Criminal Appeal No 175 of 1984 (Appeal from the High Court at Kisumu, Schofield J) June 21, 1985, Hancox JA, Platt & Gachuhi Ag JJA delivered the following Judgment. The appellant Michael Otieno Amigo was described in the trial proceedings as the third accused, although in some headings he was listed the fourth.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: MADAN & NYARANGI JJ A, GACHUHI AG JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 145 OF 1985 BETWEEN NJOROGE..................................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA ATA NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1603 OF 1984 BERNARD KIMANI MUCHOKI.......................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.....................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kiambu, G E O Tunya, Esq)
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
Esso Standard Kenya Ltd v Onesmus Kihara Mwangi Court of Appeal, at Nairobi June 5, 1985 Hancox JA, Platt & Gachuhi Ag JJA Civil Application No NAI 29 of 1984 (Application from the High Court at Nairobi, Nyarangi J) Appeal – delay in filing–– letter to Registrar requesting for precedings not copied to respondent – Rule 81 (2) Court of Appeal Rules. Nyarangi J as he then was on July 18, 1980 gave judgment in favour of the Esso Standard Kenya (no plaintiff) the defendant filed notice of appeal o
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
Esso Standard Kenya Ltd v Onesmus Kihara Mwangi Court of Appeal, at Nairobi June 5, 1985 Hancox JA, Platt & Gachuhi Ag JJA Civil Application No NAI 29 of 1984 (Application from the High Court at Nairobi, Nyarangi J) Appeal – delay in filing–– letter to Registrar requesting for precedings not copied to respondent – Rule 81 (2) Court of Appeal Rules. Nyarangi J as he then was on July 18, 1980 gave judgment in favour of the Esso Standard Kenya (no plaintiff) the defendant filed notice of appeal o