Judgment[1985] KECA 41
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Kneller, Nyarangi & Platt JJA) CIVIL APEEAL NO. 31 OF 1985 BETWEEN RUSSEL CO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL, AT KISUMU CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 116 OF 1985 Madhupaper International Limited versus Kerr (application from the High Court at Nairobi, O’Connor J, Civil Suit 3438 of 1985) December 16, 1985, Kneller, Nyarangi JJA & Gachuhi Ag JA delivered the following Order of the Court. Madhupaper International Limited, the company, manufacturers cartons, tissues and lavatory paper in the industrial area of Nairobi.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Madan Ag CJ, Kneller & Nyarangi JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 21 OF 1985 KAIRU ………………………………..…….APPLICANT VERSUS SHAW & 3 OTHERS……………….....…RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Kneller, Nyarangi JJA & Platt Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 14 OF 1985 Between ANWAR KIPNGETICH ......................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC......................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Nairobi, O’Kubasu J) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT November 12, 1985, Kneller, Nyarangi JJA & Platt Ag JA delivered the following Judgment.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Court of Appeal, at Nakuru Civil Appeal No 46 of 1984 Timsales Limited versus Up&Down Saw Mills (Kenya) Limited (Appeal from the High Court at Nakuru, Masime J, Civil Suit No 87 of 1974) November 6, 1985, Madan Ag CJ delivered the following Judgment. On January 3, 1974 the appellant (defendant) borrowed from the respondent (plaintiff) a portable crosscut saw in good working condition.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Madan, Kneller JJA & Platt Ag JA ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 133 OF 1984 Between JOSEPH KIOKO MUOKI..............................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC...................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Nairobi, Aganyanya J)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Kitavi v Cosatal Bottlers Limited Court of Appeal, at Mombasa September 10, 1985 Kneller, Hancox & Nyarangi JJA Civil Appeal No 69 of 1984 (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J) Cases 1. Paris v Stephey Borough Council (No 2) [1951] 1 AER 42 2.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Gachuhi Ag JA CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 41 OF 1985 Between BATHOLOMEW MUYALE .............................APPLICANT AND SHEM NYAMBASI MULEFU ...........................DEFENDANT ELIJA NANDI CHIKAMAI................................DEFENDANT (In an intended appeal from an order of the High Court at Kakamega, Aganyanya J in Civil Suit No 13 of 1979) *************************
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KUSUMU (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Platt Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 143 OF 1983 Between ANGUKO......................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Kisumu, Schofield J)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Kneller, Hancox JJA & Nyarangi Ag JA ) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 64 OF 1984 Between KENYA CARGO HANDLING SERVICES LIMITED.................APPELLANT AND DAVID UGWWANG................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Hancox JA, Chesoni & Platt Ag JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO 34 OF 1982 KEMFRO AFRICA LIMITED T/A “MERU EXPRESS SERVICES (1976)” & ANOTHER …………….…..…………….APPLICANT VERSUS OLIVE LUBIA & ANOTHER ………….....…..RESPONDENT RULING When this appeal was called on for hearing, Mr Kwach, appearing on behalf of the two respondents, took the preliminary objection that the mandatory provisions of Rule 85 (1) (f) of rules of this court had not been complied with, in that none o
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
children would be an important factor in giving rise to a presumption of marriage, it is not a must in order to give rise to it. As far as the evidence of Mary Njoki herself was concerned she spoke in great detail about her early association and life with the deceased, about their three places of residence in Pumwani, Langata and Lavington where they lived together, about the two houses which the deceased bought in partnership, one of them from the National Housing Corporation, about the amount
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Madan, Hancox & Kneller JJA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 56 OF 1981 BETWEEN CHARLES OLOO..................................................APPELLANT AND KENYA POSTS & TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION.................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Nairobi, Nyarangi J)