Judgment[1984] KECA 30
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Mr Prinja conceded that Stella was not challenged in cross-examination on her recognition of the appellant’s voice (as she should have been) but maintained that nevertheless the judge was not relieved of the duty of administering…
…None of these matters, Mr Prinja said, were canvassed by the judge in his judgement, which it was his duty to do, notwithstanding that most of them were not put to the witnesses in cross-examination.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…The evidence of the ballistics expert as to his conclusions does not appear to have been seriously challenged in cross-examination.…
…As a recorded police statement, not made on oath, not subject to the test of cross examination, exhibit 122 could not take the place of sworn testimony.…