Judgment[1984] KECA 112
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
…That is undoubtedly correct, but until this court had decided that the High Court should not have determined the issue (if, indeed, in this case it should not) the High Court order remains in effect and is valid and enforceable…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…to order the defendant to accept back his money and give the plaintiff back his shamba which he mortgaged to him.…
…Jessel MR in Pulbrook v Richmond Consolidated Mining Co., (1878), 9, Ch, D 610, 615 (CA) explained the consequence of a court order for the rectification of the register of a company in this way “The name of Mr Cuthbert has…