Search court decisions

…There is no privity of contract between the Defendant tenant and the Plaintiff. (2) It has been pointed out on behalf of the Plaintiff by Mr Shah that in equity, if the Plaintiff purchased with notice of the tenancy of the…

…The same principle of equity would interfere to see that the equities were equal despite the absence in both cases of privity of contract between the parties.…

…There is no privity of contract between the donee, as Plaintiff, and the Defendant.…

…The grounds of opposition included a contention that the Plaintiff’s suit against the 3rd Defendant had no chance of succeeding in the absence of privity of contract and any reasonable cause of action.…

…While conceding that there was no privity of contract between the Plaintiff and the 2nd and 3rd Defendants, Counsel submitted that the two parties were interested parties and were sued in that capacity.…