Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS CIVIL CASE NO. 490 OF 2001 IRON AFRICA LIMITED …………………………………….
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
has been put forward by the applicant to justify the grant of the orders sought. It is observed that the order sought is the setting aside of a default judgment entered herein.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
High Court Of Kenya At Nairobi Milimani Commercial Courts Civil Case No 535 Of 2000 Delons Limited versus Express Diaries Limited
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
Draw a notice of penal consequences. The process server has to ensure there is personal service.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA John Njoroge Warui vUniversal Bank Ltd High Court of Kenya at Nairobi August 7, 2000 Milimani Commercial Courts T Mbaluto, Judge Civil Case No 583 of 2000 This is an application for an injunction under Order 39 rule 1, 2 and 3 and to restrain the defendant from repossessing or taking possession of motor vehicle registration number KAC 031J until the suit filed by the plaintiff/applicant against the defendant/respondent is heard and determined. The application is supported by
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA 1 Barry Scutt & Another v Hitesh Jethwa & 2 Others High Court of Kenya at Nairobi June 29, 2000 Milimani Commercial Courts T Mbaluto, Judge Civil Case No 937 of 2000 June 29, 2000 T Mbaluto, Judge delivered the following ruling. This ruling relates to the issue as to who between the applicants who are the plaintiffs in this suit and the 3rd defendant/respondent should bear the costs of the application filed by the plaintiffs herein.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1759 OF 1999 DAVIS NATHAN CHELOGOI..................................................PLAINTIFF versus DIAMOND TRUST BANK LTD............................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G On 11th November, 1999 I gave an order of Injunction to restrain the defendant herein from selling alienating or disposing of by public auction or private treaty or in any other way parting with title for property known as L.R.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsElection Petition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI ELECTION PETITION NO 11 OF 1998 IN THE MATTER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY & PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS ACT CAP.7 AND REGULATIONS MADE THEREUNDER AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ELECTION FOR THE GATANGA PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCY BETWEEN SAMUEL KAMAU MACHARIA..............................................................PETITIONER AND THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF KENYA..........................1ST RESPONDENT NAPATHTALI CHOMBA...............................
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. DOBIE (K) LTD..............................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS ADEN AHMED.....................................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
so that if the court subsequently adopts that award it may be difficult to execute the resultant order especially at the Land Registry. Learned counsels in this matter do not seem to see all these.Counsel for the applicant is only complaining at the Arbitrator’s misconduct.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NUMBER 101 OF 1996 FULCHAND MANEK & BROTHERS…………………………..………PLAINTIFF VERSUS BULLION BANK LIMITED……………………………………………….DEFENDANT RULING There being no denial by the Defendant/Respondent that the cheques on which the applicant’s account was debited did not belong to the plaintiff/applicant as deposed in paragraphs 5 – 9 of the affidavit in support of the application for summary judgment, I am of the view that the defence filed a hall
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 1676 OF 1995 ROSEMARY WANJIKU KINYANJUI …………..PLAINTIFF VERSUS MARTIN WAINAINA KINYAJUI……….....….RESPONDENT RULING OF THE COURT Before the 24th October, 1995, I had considered the application before me and said as follows: “The parties herein have been in matrimony for thirty one years. They have materially prospered together and can without embellishment be said to be quite rich.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL CASE NO 2042 OF 1985 LONRHO EAST AFRICA LIMITED .....................PLAINTIFF VERSUS CONSOLIDATED CITY VENTURES.......................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
In objecting to an application filed by Mr. Mwihia on behalf of the applicant seeking for several orders namely:- “(a) That the decree be amended to conform with the Judgment of this court; (b) That the annexed decree be approved as the decree of this court; (c) That the plaintiff be allowed to nominate his mother Raphaela Njeri Paul Njagi as the transferee of the suit land; (d) That the Deputy Registrar be authorized to sign the transfer documents to effect the registration of Raphaela Njeri Pa
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 532 OF 1986 DOUGLAS KAARIUKI MUNDIA........................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.......................................................................................RESPONDENT RULING In this case the applicant was jointly charged with 6 others at Kiambu Senior Resident Magistrate’s court with malicious damage to property contrary to section 339 (1) of the Penal Code and assau
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
Kagiri v Republic (Criminal Appeal 18 of 1988) [1989] KECA 68 (KLR) (31 July 1989) (Judgment) Kagiri v Republic[1989] eKLR Neutral citation: [1989] KECA 68 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MALINDI CRIMINAL APPEAL 18 OF 1988 JRO MASIME, JE GICHERU & RO KWACH, JJA JULY 31, 1989 BETWEEN DAVID MBUA KAGIRI .......................................................................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ..................................................................................
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 1414 OF 1980 JUMA KHAMISI KARIUKI ….…..………………………………..….………PLAINTIFF versus EAST AFRICA INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND GEORGE OKOKO ….….DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.3923 OF 1985 KIGIKA DEVELOPERS LIMITED.........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION...........................................................DEFENDANT RULING This matter originally came before me on an application to strike out the defence. I struck out the defence but as the action was somewhat unusual I refused to give judgment, but directed that the case be set down for
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO'S 608 OF 1985 and 265 OF1986 (CONSOLIDATED) 1. PETER MAINA NDIRANGU.........................................APPELLANTS VERSUS REPUBLIC........................................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE 3452 OF 1984 JOSEPH MUTUNGA WAMBUA............................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KANTILAL KHIMJI PATEL & ANOTHER..........................DEFENDANT