Judgment[1986] KEHC 41
Mbuthia v Nairobi City Commission
High Court at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1252 OF 1985 MBUTHIA........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION.................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPLICATION NO 1624 OF 1979 MARTINE APIYO WAINDI …………. PLAINTIFF VERSUS PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING CO LTD & ANOTHER …....……DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Case
tends as a direction to the Court hearing the application for Order of Prohibition to grant the Order without using its own discretion whether it should do so. The Attorney-General did not need any authority, nor a reminder, that in the light of the opinions expressed by the Constitutional Court he could terminate the proceedings even when coupled with a wet hope that he would do so.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 2260 OF 1982 NEWSTANLEY HOTEL LIMITED ...................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS ARCADE TOBACCONISTS LIMITED..........................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCase number Civil Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 648 OF 1985 NATGIL ENTERPRISES LIMITED........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS GATUKUYU COFEE GROWERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD & 2 OTHERS..............................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 772 OF 1984 AURORA BAKING COMPANY (1975) LTD………………PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT AND PHENNTHA WANINGI AND 3 OTHERS………….DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS RULING By an order of this court dated 19.11.84 the hearing of the plaintiff’s/applicant’s application filed in this court on 13.11.84 was stood over to 8.1.85 before the Duty Judge and the caveat lodged in respect of L R No.10445/3 situated in Nyandarua District was extended pending the disposa
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1419 OF 1984 GORDHANDAS DHARAMSHI & BROTHERS LIMITED................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC............................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Second Class District Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi, Miss B L Obayo)
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA MWAURA GATHOGO MUKONO KARANJA .................………………………………………....................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS NEPATAO OLE PUNYUA................…………………………......................................
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL 297 OF 1984 AMOS MBURU GATHAGU..........................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC................................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Thika, RN Kamiro Esq)
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
advocates for all the parties had agreed on the quotum of damages and hence the following consent order was recorded by this court. “By consent judgment for the plaintiff against all the defendants jointly and severally in the inclusive sum of shs 2,153,500 inclusive of costs with court disbursements to be paid by the defendants.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE 751 OF 1977 1. BEATRICE MUSANGI...........................................................PLAINTIFFS VERSUS MARGARET NZAMBI...............................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 35 OF 1983 REPUBLIC.......................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS HASMUKH MEGHJI SHAH.......................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL 357 OF 1983 OKELLO ODERO..................................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC..........................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court, at Machakos)
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 1983 JAMES ODEMBA OTIENO...............................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.......................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from Conviction and Sentence of the Court Martial at 7th Kenya Rifles Langata Barracks, Nairobi)
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
In view of this defence and the issue framed upon it, I drew the attention of the learned counsel to order XIV, rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and it was agreed that the 10th issue be determined as preliminary issue by the court. In support of this defence Mr Nowrojee (with Mr I Kapila for the defendants) referred me to various passages in The Encyclopaedia of Forms and Precedents, 4th edition volume 9 and Halsbury’s Laws of England, 4th edition, volume 18, the substance of which is th