Judgment[2000] KEHC 58
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…THIRD RULING This court made orders on 6th March 2000 in favour of the defendant. They allege to have moved to execute those orders but were not allegedly obeyed.…
…orders for 6 months or such a period that will meet the interest of justice for contempt of orders of this court given on 6th March 2000 and that costs be provided for.…
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
…following the orders of this court issued on 18th September 2025.…
…In addition, he stated that the Respondent’s relatives are aware of the orders of this court which they have deed.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Suit
…All counsel said, which is true, is that court orders must be obeyed even those arising out of a consent order between the parties.…
…The general principle is that orders of the court must be obeyed and a litigant who deliberately and without proper excuse disobeys such an order is not allowed to proceed. I noted that Mr.…
Division and case type: Environment and LandPetition
…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…
…Further that seeking orders of the court on forged titles borders on contempt of court. 18. Counsel cited Giella vs Cassman Brown (supra) for the conditions of grant of a temporary injunction.…