Search court decisions

…APPELLANT AND MEA LIMITED ........................................RESPONDENT (An application for stay of execution of the order and decree pending the lodging and hearing of an intended appeal from the ruling and order of…

…The applicant will pay the respondent Shs 600,000/= per month with effect from 1st May, 1999 pending the hearing and final determination of the intended appeal. Costs of the application to be in the appeal.…

…APPELLANT AND MEA LIMITED ........................................RESPONDENT (An application for stay of execution of the order and decree pending the lodging and hearing of an intended appeal from the ruling and order of…

…The applicant will pay the respondent Shs 600,000/= per month with effect from 1st May, 1999 pending the hearing and final determination of the intended appeal. Costs of the application to be in the appeal.…

…Upon this, we do not consider that they have an arguable appeal to this Court against the order of the superior which they now seek to have stayed under rule 5 2(b) of the Rules of this Court pending hearing and disposal…

…Respondents (Being an application for variation of conditions for stay made on 8th August, 2000 and for an injunction in form of a stay pe nding the hearing and determination of an Appeal from a decision of the Honourable…

…We think we should confirm these orders but with certain minor variations as follows: 1.The applicant shall, within 21 (twenty one) days of the date hereof pay to the respondent the su m of Shs.2,300,000/= pending the hearing…

…On 2nd day of July, 1999 he filed this application under rule 47 of the Rules of this Court seeking that his application be set down for hearing as a matter of urgency.…

…In that regard I will exercise my discretion in favour of the applicant and order that the application be fixed for hearing before the full Court urgently. Costs in the application.…

…At the hearing of the application it was not shown to the satisfaction of the learned single judge that judgment had so been entered.…

…But rule 54(2) of the Rules of this Court expressly says that no additional evidence shall be adduced at a full court hearing like the one before us.…

…Kagiri for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents is not averse to the status quo of the suit premises being maintained pending the hearing and determination of the applicant's intended appeal, we order that the status quo in respect…

…This application before us is for stay of proceedings in the superior court pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal. There is nothing however to stay under rule 5(2) of the Rules of this court. Mr.…

…The hearing went on and this time round, the applicant won. It is this latter decision that the respondent, Sule, asked Tanui, J. to bring before his court by way of certiorari and have the same quashed.…