Search court decisions

…(IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 71 OF 1994 BETWEEN FREDRICK G.K. WAITHAKA .............................…

…NO. 627 OF 1987(OS)) ******************** RULING This is an application for extension of time to file an intended appeal against the judgment of the superior court (Mbito J) dated 6th June, 1991.…

…CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 81 OF 1997 (UR. 36/97) BETWEEN FARMERS INDUSTRIES LIMITED ........................ APPLICANT AND 1. KENYA COMMERCIAL FINANCE CO. LTD 2. P. G. WAWERU T/A IDEAL AUCTIONEERS ............…

…RESPONDENTS (An application for Injunction pending intended Appeal from the Ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Justice Mbito) dated 13th March, 1997 in H.C.C.C.…

…JA (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 89 OF 1997 BETWEEN WILSON ORITO OMUSINA ....................................APPLICANT AND 1. JOHN KIMOSOP MAINA 2. JAMES MUKOTSWE 3.…

…In the circumstances and for the reasons given by Counsel for the applicant I grant the leave sought and order that the application be marked as withdrawn.…

…CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.…

…Thereafter the applicant did not make any application to the same court for bail pending appeal to this court as he should properly have done in view of the provisions of s.361 (b) of the Criminal Procedure Code as read with…

…CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 87 1999 (32/99 UR) BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC .......................................…

…The respondent has opposed the application on the ground that the move is an afterthought only meant to delay the disposal of the application.…

…CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 260 OF 1999 BETWEEN JOEL MUTHUI KYAMBU ................................. APPLICANT AND UNITED FINANCE LIMITED ............................…

…RESPONDENT (Application for striking out of the Notice of Appeal in an intended appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Pall, J.) dated 8th September, 1991 in H.C.C.C.…

…CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 329 OF 1995 BETWEEN KITHAKA NTHAKANIO .................................. APPLICANT AND THATHI NTHAKANIO ...................................…

…At the hearing of the application it was not shown to the satisfaction of the learned single judge that judgment had so been entered.…

…REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: KWACH, SHAH & OWUOR JJ.A CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 306 OF 1998 (UR. 118/98) BETWEEN NYANJA HOLDINGS LIMITED GEORGE NJAU MBUGUA NYANJA MRS. ENID N.…

…NO. 1965 OF 1991) ********************** RULING OF THE COURT The application for injunction, filed in the superior court in 1991 (we are now in 1998) was withdrawn on 12th March, 1998.…

…REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM: OMOLO, J.A (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.…

…NAI. 141 OF 2004 BETWEEN WALTER AWUOTH AYUGI ………………………………………… APPLICANT AND HESBORN SULE OKOTH ………………………………………… RESPONDENT (Application for leave to file and serve notice and record of appeal out of time in an intended appeal…

…REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: (GICHERU, OMOLO & SHAH JJ.A) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI249 OF 2000 (117/2000 UR) BETWEEN Hurlingham Hospital Management Ltd .................... Applicant AND 1.…

…Respondents (Being an application for variation of conditions for stay made on 8th August, 2000 and for an injunction in form of a stay pe nding the hearing and determination of an Appeal from a decision of the Honourable…

…CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 211 OF 1999 (84/99 UR) BETWEEN PETER KANYIRI KOIGI......................................APPLICANT AND 1. MAKAHU OLE SEKUNDA...............................1ST RESPONDENT 2.…

…The costs occasioned by this application shall be in the intended appeal. Given at Nairobi this 16th day of August, 1999. J.E. GICHERU ............... JUDGE OF APPEAL A.B. SHAH ............... JUDGE OF APPEL E.…

…CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 71 OF 1999 (UR.27/99) BETWEEN BANDAPTAI AGRO & HARDWARE LIMITED ..................…

…NO. 474 OF 1997) *************** RULING OF THE COURT This is an application under rule 5 (2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules for a stay of execution of the ruling and order of Rimita J given on 17th March, 1999.…

…CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 71 OF 1999 (UR.27/99) BETWEEN BANDAPTAI AGRO & HARDWARE LIMITED ..................…

…NO. 474 OF 1997) *************** RULING OF THE COURT This is an application under rule 5 (2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules for a stay of execution of the ruling and order of Rimita J given on 17th March, 1999.…

…IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 89 OF 2003 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT 2001 SECTION 162 BABY DK (AN INFANT) RULING This is an application for international adoption.…

…By the application, the Applicant seeks from the Court the following orders – 1. That the application herein be certified as urgent and be heard ex-parte in the first instance. 2.…

…That costs of this application be provided for.…

…REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 1983 JAMES ODEMBA OTIENO...............................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC................................................…

…The appellant now appeals to this court against his conviction and sentence of death pronounced on February 3, 1983 having been given leave to appeal to this court on October 11, 1983 upon the 8 grounds as set out in his application…

…REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO J.A (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.NAI. 214 OF 1998 BETWEEN NATIONAL CEREALS & PRODUCE BOARD.......................APPLICANT AND ALBERT ONGARO.........…

…CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 318 OF 1996 (UR.122/96) BETWEEN EVANSON K. NJOROGE..................................1STAPPLICANT DR.…

…NO. 2891 OF 1995) ********************** RULING OF THE COURT: Applications Nos. 318 and 319 both of 1996 have been consolidated and have been argued together.…

…APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …………………………………………………………… RESPONDENT R U L I N G By an application dated 14th July 2005 brought under section 357 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, David Wainaina Mubea (hereinafter referred to as…

…I have considered the application, the grounds of appeal and the proceedings. At this stage I can only state that the appeal raises arguable issues.…