Judgment[1998] KECA 220
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: KWACH, SHAH & OWUOR JJ.A CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 118/98) BETWEEN NYANJA HOLDINGS LIMITED GEORGE NJAU MBUGUA NYANJA MRS.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OWUOR, J.A (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 62/99) BETWEEN MOSES KIPNGETICH KURGAT ..............................APPLICANT AND THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE LAW SOCIETY ...................................RESPONDENT (Application for stay of execution in an intended appeal from the ruling and order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Hon.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsElection Petition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI ELECTION PETITION NO 11 OF 1998 IN THE MATTER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY & PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS ACT CAP.7 AND REGULATIONS MADE THEREUNDER AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ELECTION FOR THE GATANGA PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCY BETWEEN SAMUEL KAMAU MACHARIA..............................................................PETITIONER AND THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF KENYA..........................1ST RESPONDENT NAPATHTALI CHOMBA...............................
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. DOBIE (K) LTD..............................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS ADEN AHMED.....................................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
The applicants bail is reinstated on similar terms as granted earlier. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 3rd day of June, 1998 J.L.A.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI civ app 249 of 97 ZEBRON NGUKU MOTE...................................APPELLANT V EPHANTUS MOTE WAKARIA.................................RESPONDENT JUDGMENT OF THE COURT This is a second appeal and concerns land. A portion of the suit land was being cultivated by the appellant, who is the son of the respondent.