Judgment[2004] KEHC 355
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 121 OF 2004 (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
…and; therefore, it would be an exercise in futility and prejudicial to the applicant if the respondent was given an extension for time to perfect his appeal in view of the provisions of Order 45 rule 17(2) of the Civil Procedure…
…Rules.…
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relationsmiscellaneous cause
…Court clerk – Sango R U L I N G Coming under O.9B r. 8 Civil Procedure Rules and S. 3A Civil Procedure Act the now 2nd respondent, one Uwe Meixner, had this main prayer laid before court on 6.6.04: 1.…
Division and case type: Employment and Labour RelationsCase number Cause
…Rule 32 of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules, 2010 provides for the review of the decisions made by the court.…
Division and case type: Employment and Labour RelationsCase number Cause
…The application is brought under order VI rule 8(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules.…
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
…The Application for review was urged by Miss Oyombe who submitted that the Application grounded on Rule 32(b) of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010 on account of error or mistake on the face of the record.…