Judgment[1994] KECA 69
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM: GICHERU, KWACH & TUNOI) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 108 OF 1992 BETWEEN HERMAN AMBONYA ODONGO......................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC...................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from an order of the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega (Justice Osiemo) dated 14th October, 1992 in CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU CORAM: COCKAR, OMOLO & TUNOI, JJ.A. 39 OF 1992 BETWEEN JOSEPH NJOROGE NJUGUNA .............................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU (Coram: Gicheru, Muli & Omolo JJ A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 68 OF 1993 JATANI……………….… APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC……………RESPONDENT (Appeal from a conviction and sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Lady Justice R Nambuye) dated 26th November, 1992 in HC CR A No 387 of 1992)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS 111, 112, 113, 114 & 115 OF 1993 ENOCK OTIENO OTIENO OTIENO JACERO JOSEPH ORWA OBONYO SAMSON NYAKWA ODEYO ZACHARY OPIYO MATEWA…....…….. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC……………………………..
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA AT COURT OF APPEAL IN KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL 32 OF 1989 JOSEPH OLOO NYAMUGA ...………….…….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ……………………...…..………… RESPONDENT ****************** ORDER OF THE COURT The appellant having served the sentence and released from prison on 25th May, 1992, and his whereabouts being unknown, this appeal abates under rule 70(7) of the Rules of this Court.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA AT THE COURT OF APPEAL IN NAKURU CRIMINAL APPEAL 16 OF 1991 SIMON MARUTIT ………..……………….. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ……………………………….RESPONDENT (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya Nakuru (Tanui, J.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU CORAM: MASIME, GICHERU & KWACH, JJ.A. 67 OF 1992 BETWEEN EVANS MOSES SAETA ...................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................RESPONDENT (An appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Tanui, J) dated 24th October, 1991 in H.C.CR.A.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU CORAM: MASIME, GICHERU & KWACH, JJ.A. 67 OF 1992 BETWEEN EVANS MOSES SAETA ...................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................RESPONDENT (An appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Tanui, J) dated 24th October, 1991 in H.C.CR.A.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU Criminal Appeal 7 of 1991 JOSHUA LIYAYI MUSUNGU ……….....……….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ………..………………………….… RESPONDENT (Appeal from a sentence of the High Court of Kenya Kakamega (Mr Justice Osiemo) dated 15th October, 1990, In H.C.CR.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU Criminal Appeal 37 of 1992 JOSEPH KIPTURGOT A TOWET……………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………….………………………………….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU Criminal Appeal 37 of 1992 JOSEPH KIPTURGOT A TOWET……………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………….………………………………….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
The intention as can be detected from the evidence was to beat the two boys in order to get them to produce the money. The next question is whether the intention to beat or chastise the deceased and Crispo so that they produce the stolen money was a common intention shared by all the four accused persons at the time they were beating the two boys.
Division and case type: CriminalMiscellaneous Criminal Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU CRIMINAL REVISION NO 13 OF 1991 JOHN OPIYO ARUNGA..........................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC...........................................RESPONDENT REVISION This is an application for a revision under sections 362, 364, 365 and 367 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The application has been filed by M/s Gumba Onywera & Company Advocates for the applicant John Opiyo Arunga and it arises out of a Miscellaneous Criminal Application No 12 of
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
the same that he advanced before the Superior Court. He has also promised to rehabilitate himself in order to become a useful member of the society.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Okhwatenge v Republic Court of Appeal, at Kisumu March 13, 1991 Hancox CJ, Gachuhi & Cockar JJ A Criminal Appeal No 96 of 1990 (Appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega (Mbogholi - Msagha, J) dated 5th July, 1990 in HC CR App No 300 of 1989) Criminal Practice and Procedure – lapse of time – whether invalidates a charge. Criminal Law – false pretence – charge of procuring registration of land by false pretences - Penal Code (cap 63) section 320 - whether pro
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU (Coram: Nyarangi, Cockar JJ.A & Omolo Ag. 120 OF 1990 BETWEEN JOSEPH KIMANTHI M'MNIRIDUA..............................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC...............................................RESPOND ENT (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Tanui, J.) dated 29th March, 1990 in Criminal appeal No.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM: NYARANGI, MASIME & COCKAR, JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 126 OF 1990 BETWEEN TOM JACOB MIDILA OJWANG..............................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC..............................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Kisumu (Khamoni, J.) dated 5th October, 1990 in H.C.CR.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU crim apps 235,236,238 of 90 GARI & 2 OTHERS………..…………..PLAINTIFF V REPUBLIC……………………….………DEFENDANT ed) (From Original Conviction and Sentence of the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Kisumu (C.O. Ong’undi, Esq, P.M.) in Criminal Case No 189 of 1989) Evidence – secondary evidence – notice to produce a document – Evidence Act (cap 80) section 69 – to whom such notice is given – when such notice can be dispensed with – party who does not have po
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAKURU crim app 189 of 88 OPONDO………..........…APPELLANT V REPUBLIC………….RESPONDENT Judgment. The appellant was convicted of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(1) of the Penal Code and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and six strokes of the cane followed by 5 years mandatory police supervision.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAKURU crim app 84 of 89 MUNASIA………………………APPELLANT V REPUBLIC………………..…….RESPONDENT Judgment. The appellant pleaded guilty and convicted on his plea and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.