Judgment[2003] KEHC 479
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO. 95 OF 2003 ALII MARO HERO ………………………………………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 538 OF 2002 ABDUL GAFFOR…………………………………..PLAINTIFF VERSUS JAVID IQBAL MALIK…..………………………..DEFENDANT RULING By this application filed on 3rd October, 2002, the plaintiff who had earlier filed suit for taking accounts and profits due after taking accounts now seeks to have the defendants defence filed in that suit denying existence of any agreement between the parties by which he had allegedly borrowed shs 3,000,000/= towards
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. 116 OF 1993 GURDARSHAN SINGH ………………………..APPELLANT VERSUS C.K.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI DIVORCE CAUSE NO. 4 OF 2002 A.W.H ……………………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
plus interest, and costs of this suit and interest thereon also at the usual respective rates.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
plus interest, and costs of this suit and interest thereon also at the usual respective rates.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
superior court was as noted elsewhere in this judgment; the appeal arises out of two interlocutory orders made by the superior court on November 20, 2000. In addition to declining to join the companies in the Petition, the Commissioner acceded to the prayer to have and struck out the Petition.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU (CORAM: OMOLO, TUNOI & O’KUBASU JJ A ) CIVIL APPLICATION NO 51 OF 2001 BETWEEN ABRAHAM TENOI KIMALA................................APPLICANT AND JOB KIPSANG SUTER ......................................RESPONDENT RULING OF THE COURT This is a reference from the ruling of a learned single judge of this Court delivered on 25th September, 2001, whereby, in exercise of his powers under rule 4 of our rules, he refused to grant the applicant extension of time within
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CIVIL CASE NO.102 OF 1997 INTERLAND DISTRIBUTORS LTD:::::::::::::::::::::::PLAINTIFF VERSUS P. & JOSEPH MULATYA KIMANI::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: DEFENDANT Coram: R.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CORAM: KEIWUA, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPEAL (APPLICATION) NO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 598 OF 1993 CLEMENT ODONGO AWANGE ………………….......
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: AKIWUMI, TUNOI & O'KUBASU, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 212 OF 1996 BEATRICE NYAMBURA MUCHERU ...........................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1488 OF 1998 HANNAH MUMBI KOMO………………………………………..……….PLAINTIFF -VERSUSLEONARD NJOGU NJAU T/A KINYANJUI & NJAU ADVOCATES…………………………………….DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1488 OF 1998 HANNAH MUMBI KOMO………………………………………..……….PLAINTIFF -VERSUSLEONARD NJOGU NJAU T/A KINYANJUI & NJAU ADVOCATES…………………………………….DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Civil Case 10 of 1980 FRANCIS ORIGO...............................................1st PLAINTIFF PETER PANYAKO...........................................2nd PLAINTIFF VERSUS JACOB KUMALI MUNGALA............................... DEFENDANT RULING On 12th May, 2000 the Resident Judge Eldoret, Lady Justice Nambuye wrote to me thus on the above case: - "There is an application for Review pending in theabove file.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE 2117 OF 1995 SAMMY MAINA GACHIRU ............................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS MAINA KARUMBA & 2 OTHERS .................
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA NIMA INVESTMENTS LIMITED ..............................APPLICANT AND STEPHEN MBUKI KIMANI ..................................RESPONDENT R U L I N G Having heard advocates for both parties and in all the circumstances of the case, I am satisfied that this is a proper case to exercise my discretion and grant the extension sought. Accordingly, I order that Notice of Appeal be filed within 7 days from today and the Record of Appeal within 21 days thereafter.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.1042 OF 1996 CANNON ASSURANCE (KENYA) LTD …………….…. PLAINTFF VERSUS SILVESTER KURIA KINYANJUI & ANOTHER…..
Division and case type: CRIMINAL DIVISIONCriminal Appeal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL DIVISION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1161 OF 2000 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.986 of 2000 of the District Magistrate’s at Kigumo). JOHN MAINA KAMAU......................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC........................................................................RESPONDENT CONSOLIDATED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1162 OF 2000 JOSPHAT MURANGA MBOTE........................................APPLICANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO. 1424 OF 1997 BENROSE FAST FOOD………...……..…………………………………..PLAINTIFF -VERSUSMURANGA PROPERTIES LTD……....….…………………………..DEFENDANT RULING In this application which is by Chamber Summons the applicant is asking for the Orders prayed in the application.