Judgment[1999] KEHC 30
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
…It seeks to stop the prosecution of the petition and its striking out for being frivolous, vexatious, an abuse of the court process and meant to embarrass the company.…
…It is contended by the petitioner that the application be struck out as a sham and abuses the court process. As the goods were supplied in 1996 to 1997, the company does not show liability has ever been disputed.…
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
…The application is tailored at buying time for the applicant and thus is an abuse of court process. 2.…
…The court lacked jurisdiction because judgment had been delivered, the court was functus officio and could not entertain the application especially that the application was for review and the respondent had preferred an appeal…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
…The application was an abuse of the court process and intended to embarrass this Honourable court; ii.…
…His finding was that institution of the present application for revision when Constitutional Petition No. 50 of 2020 was subsisting was an abuse of the court process.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsJudicial Review
…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…
…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…
…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsElection Petition
…The Court had this to say “throwing a bundle of court documents to a party to be served with them does not constitute proper service of court process. It would be ridiculous to extend the rule to that limit”.…