Search court decisions

…The value of the subject of the fraud was stated as Ksh.5,108,210/=. When the applicant was arraigned before the said court, he pleaded not guilty to the charge.…

…Mr Harwood submitted that this was not applicable to criminal cases, since the State must certainly be able to prosecute on the basis of fraud or mistake. It was the truth behind the document that mattered.…

…In this case however, Gitonga does not allege a criminal fraud upon himself.…

…The onus of proving fraud or concealment of material fact lies in the applicant. There is no dispute she was married to the deceased. The marriage was registered under the Marriage Act.…

…I find the fact of fraud and non-disclosure proved by the applicant. I order that the letters of administration (intestate) issued to the respondents be nullified by the Deputy Registrar of this Court.…

…There also must be a knowledge on the appellant’s part of such fraud. From the evidence before the Court and the submission used – the petition of appeal does not question the fakeness of the dollars.…

…From the evidence of PW1 no fraud on the part of the Appellant is shown. PW1further admits Appellant had his permission to use the items while in his employment.…

…It follows that we nd no merit in the appellant’s persistence in challenging the nding that he was involved in the fraud. 4. It remains, however, to make one clarication.…

…He stated that the three cases are similar; that they were investigated by the Banking Fraud Investigations Department (BFID); and that they were preferred against the applicant on different dates between 25rh April and 6th…

…It is sad, perhaps, that, under section 143 (1) of the Registered Land Act cap 300 no order can be made to rectify a first registration on the ground of fraud or mistake, but that is irrelevant to the question which we have…

…replaced the former Act have provisions for the rectification of the land register by the Registrar in specific cases and by order of the court “if it is satisfied that any registration was obtained, made or omitted by fraud…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…