Search court decisions

…of proof was shifted and the defence rejected, there was no evidence that PW3 entered the premises with a motorcycle, the electronic evidence was not properly produced, the appellant had a disability and could not ride a…

…Finally, he submits that burden of proof was shifted to him, yet he has not sought to demonstrate how.…

…of proof was shifted and the defence rejected, there was no evidence that PW3 entered the premises with a motorcycle, the electronic evidence was not properly produced, the appellant had a disability and could not ride a…

…Finally, he submits that burden of proof was shifted to him, yet he has not sought to demonstrate how.…

…of proof was shifted and the defence rejected, there was no evidence that PW3 entered the premises with a motorcycle, the electronic evidence was not properly produced, the appellant had a disability and could not ride a…

…Finally, he submits that burden of proof was shifted to him, yet he has not sought to demonstrate how.…

…of proof was shifted and the defence rejected, there was no evidence that PW3 entered the premises with a motorcycle, the electronic evidence was not properly produced, the appellant had a disability and could not ride a…

…Finally, he submits that burden of proof was shifted to him, yet he has not sought to demonstrate how.…

…Mr Azangalala also alleged in his memorandum of appeal that the magistrate had misdirected himself as regards the burden of proof and had failed specifically to state that he found the charge proved against the appellant…

…We have carefully studied the judgment but we are satisfied that, taken as a whole, the judgment shows that the magistrate did not err as regards the burden of proof and that the only interpretation of his judgment is that…

…The magistrate considered the forms with the whole evidence without placing any burden of proof on the appellant, and it was not indeed suggested that he had done otherwise in this appeal.…

…Such sections are the source for the principles of law relating to the burden of proof being always on the prosecution and the standard of proof to be always beyond reasonable doubt.…

…That the learned high court judge erred in both law and facts by upholding the case for the prosecution as proved beyond the reasonable doubt whereas the burden of proof was not discharged as the law demands in that:- I.…

…was in “no man’s land” near the Kenya-Somali border, and essential witnesses including the Somali Militia officers, were not called to testify, and all in all, the prosecution did not in the circumstances discharge the burden…

…The burden of proof was on the prosecution throughout and the standard of proof was beyond reasonable doubt. The charge was based on the premises that the stuff was a petroleum product.…

…possession could not safely be relied upon to form the basis of a conviction. 11.It is the law that once an accused person is found in possession of a recently stolen item, then the burden, unlike in all criminal cases where the burden…

…of proof is the prosecution’s to discharge, shifts to that accused person to explain how he came to be in possession.…

…This burden of proof was satisfied. 26.The appellant was identified positively by the PW1 the complainant and by PW2.…

…When the appellant was confronted with the charge of robbery, he denied it and put the burden of proof squarely on the prosecution.…

…The burden of proof lay on the prosecution to prove that Gitonga had not received payment, and the issue of payment was highly controversial.…

…The learned trial judge recounted the prosecution evidence, the appellant’s unsworn statement, correctly pointed out upon whom the burden of proof lay and said the appellant’s unsworn statement suggested the defence of drunkenness…

…The learned trial judge recounted the prosecution evidence, the appellant’s unsworn statement, correctly pointed out upon whom the burden of proof lay and said the appellant’s unsworn statement suggested the defence of drunkenness…

…Thus, granted that the burden of proof in contempt of court allegations is higher than the balance of probabilities standard in civil matters, this court nds that 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th Respondents may not have not been on…

…We think, however, that he lost sight of the fact that the burden of proof that the statements were voluntary was on the prosecution and that evidence that the appellants had been subjected to some violence while in custody…