Search court decisions

…The advocate attending for the respondent indicated that submissions were to be filed on 20 February 2025 instead of 21 January 2025.…

…The respondent has drafted written submissions and will do so and serve them once allowed to file out of time.…

…Parties agreed to dispose off the petition by way of written submissions. Submissions were filed for both parties. The Petitioner’s Case 5.…

…The Petitioner’s Submissions 31.…

…Titus Owino Muganda who deposed that 14th May, 2025 the court directed that the Petition be disposed of by way of written submissions and the parties adopted the directions and the Petitioner filed submissions on 24th May…

…The court directed that parties would have 14 days a piece to file and exchange submissions, and the Petitioner had leave to file supplementary submissions.…

…NO. 947 OF 1996) ************************* JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties herein, we allow the appeal and order that the deceased’s body be handed over to the appellant…

…As regards this ground which we agree raised a matter of law properly for decision by this Court, namely, in the submission that the finding in fact has no evidence to support it, we have come to the conclusion that there…

…NO. 947 OF 1996) ************************* JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties herein, we allow the appeal and order that the deceased’s body be handed over to the appellant…

…The ex-parte applicant’s submissions were not on record by the agreed timeline of 17 December 2023. 4. Despite service, the Respondents did not bother to participate in the proceedings or file submissions. 5.…

…The Appeal was disposed of by written submissions. 4.…

…It was the Respondents’ submission that the Appellant’s witness Felix Kosgei testified that they approved the second loan because the Respondents qualified and that termination on that ground was then unjustified.…

…Awarding one month’s salary in lieu of notice without analysing the evidence on record and submissions by the parties. Awarding gratuity without analysing the evidence on record and submissions by the parties.…

…Failing to consider the respondent’s submissions on the quantum and ignoring the submissions and authorities.…

…She further directed the applicant to le and serve submissions. 4.…

…The applicants led their written submissions on 31st October, 2014, while the respondent led grounds of opposition dated 22nd October, 2014 and a replying adavit dated 24th October 2014, together with their submissions…

…The Learned Magistrate erred in law and fact by ignoring the submissions by Appellant’s Advocates and relying heavily on the submissions of the Respondent’s Advocates and showing outright bias. xii.…

…The Court gave further directions on 23rd October, 2023, that the appeal be canvassed by way of written submissions, and a judgment dated fixed on 6th February, 2024. 4. Submissions were filed for both parties.…

…The appeal was disposed of by way of written submissions. The Appellant’s submissions are dated 12th September,2024 while the Respondent’s submissions are dated 15th October, 2024. Analysis 6.…

…As stated above the appeal was disposed of by way of written submissions. The Appellant’s Submissions 23.…

…Under page 3 of the judgment, in deciding, the court finds that the respondents did not file a response or written submissions.…

…The respondents filed written submissions and a list of authorities on 28 January 2025. These were filed after court attendance on 20 January 2025, and the court allowed 7 days to file these records.…

…In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to file submissions to dispose of the preliminary objection.…

…The Applicant will have 14 days after service by the respondent to file and serve submissions. Mention for taking ruling date on 24th September 2024.” 9.…

…The Claimant did not file submissions within the agreed timelines (while the Respondent filed its submissions on 4 October 2023). 10. The Court has considered the record, application, affidavits, and submissions. 11.…

…The Claimant failed to file submissions in relation to the instant application despite clear orders. On several occasions, he was not represented in Court.…

…On 27th April 2022, the court directed that the petition be canvassed by way of written submissions. 29. The petitioner filed his submissions on 26th July 2016 whereas the respondent filed theirs on 19th September 2022.…

…Petitioner’s submissions 30.…

…The parties were also directed to file and exchange submissions. 8.…

…The Respondent/judgment debtor filed its submissions on 23 September 2023 while the applicant’s submissions were not on record. 10. The Court has considered the application, affidavits, and submissions. 11.…

…(iv) The Learned Trial Magistrate erred in law and fact in failing to consider and take into account the submissions of the Appellant as to occasion a travesty of justice to the Appellant.…

…The Appellant filed his submissions on 27 May 2024 (should have been filed and served before 3 May 2024), and the Respondent on 27 May 2024. 6. The Court has considered the Record of Appeal and submissions.…

…The Appellant filed his submissions on 29 May 2024 (should have been filed and served before 17 May 2024) and the Respondent on 29 May 2024. 7. The Court has considered the Record of Appeal and submissions.…

…Failure to file submissions 35. Submissions do not serve a cosmetic purpose. The Appellant did not explain to the Senior Principal Magistrate why he failed to file submissions.…

…The Respondent was directed to file and serve its submissions on or before 26 April 2024, while the Claimant was to file and serve its submissions on or before 10 May 2024. 4.…

…The Respondent filed its submissions on 9 May 2024, while the Claimant filed his submissions on 26 April 2024 (the Respondent did not offer any explanation for the late filing of the submissions). 5.…