Judgment[2023] KEELC 22457
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Environment and LandPetition
It was submitted that there is a dispute regarding ownership of the suit properties. That under Order 40 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, where there is proof that any property in dispute is in a danger of being wasted, damaged, alienated or disposed of, the court ought to grant a temporary injunction to restrain such acts.
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO. 25 OF 2015 ABDULKARIM SALEH MUHSIN......................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS 1.
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionPetition
Order Ruling duly read ISAAC LENAOLA JUDGE By Consent Application dated 12th August 2015 is granted as prayed but Senator Johnstone Muthama is enjoined as an Interested Party and shall file Submissions within 7 days on matters affecting him only. Submissions to be highlighted on 12th January 2016.
Division and case type: Environment and LandCivil Suit
The litigants argument is found at page 5 of the ruling 2nd paragraph line 10 from the bottom: “that order vii rule 1(2) Civil Procedure Rules is silent as to whether each plaintiff should file a verifying affidavit, that there is no need for filing affidavit by each plaintiff as what is to be verified is the correctness of the averments and not their truthfulness, that the truthfulness of the claim is a matter for the trial, that the verifying affidavit of the first respondent is sufficient
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Omolo, Shah & Owuor, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 223 OF 1999 (89/99UR) BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.....................................................APPLICANT AND DABER ENTERPRISES LIMITED...................................................................RESPONDENT (An application for a stay of execution pending the lodging and hearing of an intended appeal from the Ruling of the High Court of Kenya at
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 224 OF 1997 BETWEEN 1.
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, AKIWUMI & PALL, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 284 OF 1997 (UR.120/97) BETWEEN EZRA ODONDI OPAR ........................................APPLICANT AND TOTAL KENYA LIMITED ....................................RESPONDENT (Application for an order of a temporary injunction to restrain the Respondent from retaking possession of the Kendu Bay Total Service Station the subject matter of the Applicant's intended Appeal and to Restrain the R
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionCivil Appeal
company and that the respondents would hold the Deed Plan, when released, to the Order of the Acceptances. As this letter is also relevant in the negotiations, I reproduce it’s contents hereunder:- “East African Acceptances Ltd Stanbank House Nairobi Dear Sirs, Galot Industries Ltd Purchase of LR Nos 1337 and 1338/2.
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionCivil Suit
may have at least equal rights with him if not superior rights over the property. Consequently I will order that the suit premises remain locked, but after the applicants are given an opportunity to take away from inside the premises what is justly theirs.
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: NYARANGI, PLATT & GACHUHI JJA) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 18 OF 1987 OTIENO……………………………… APPLICANT VERSUS OUGO & ANOTHER….…………..RESPONDENT (Application for stay of execution pending an appeal in the High Court at Nairobi, Bosire J)
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionMiscellaneous Criminal Application
tends as a direction to the Court hearing the application for Order of Prohibition to grant the Order without using its own discretion whether it should do so. The Attorney-General did not need any authority, nor a reminder, that in the light of the opinions expressed by the Constitutional Court he could terminate the proceedings even when coupled with a wet hope that he would do so.
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI ( Coram: Kneller JA, Chesoni & Nyarangi Ag JJA ) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 50 OF 1983 BETWEEN NDOO T/A NGOMENI BUS SERVICE........................................APPELLANT AND KAKUZI LTD..............................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Nairobi, Hancox J)