Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, TUNOI & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 82 OF 1998 BETWEEN DAIMA BANK LIMITED ...............................1ST APPELLANT KANGETHE & COMPANY ...............................2ND APPELLANT WHITESTONE AUCTIONEERS (K) LIMITED ...............3RD APPELLANT AND K.
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI Civil Appli 23 of 1998 VIHIGA MILLERS & HIGHES LTD ...........................................................................APPELLANT AND NIFREDA MUDOLA................................................................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appli
both only saythat appeal lies to the Court of Appeal as of right from adecision of the High Court on order given under prerogativeorders. The application is supported by the affidavit of JonahKip Ngeno, a State Counsel in Mombasa sworn on 24-9-98.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 933 of 1996 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPERS LTD............................................................. PLAINTIFF VERSUS SAUTI HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 933 of 1996 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPERS LTD............................................................. PLAINTIFF VERSUS SAUTI HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1887 OF 1994 KENYA POWER AND LIGHTING COMPANY LTD........................................PLAINTIFF versus NJILUX MOTORS LIMITED............................................................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G This is an application by Notice of Motion under order 41 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules for an order that there be a stay of execution of the decree/order of this court dated 21st May, 1998 pend
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
decision of a single Judge (Shah, J.A.). On the 31st January, 1998, the learned single Judge made an order which, inter alia, awarded VAT at 15% to the bill of costs which had been taxed by a Deputy Registrar of the court at Mombasa at the total sum of Shs.15,635/=.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 3312 OF 1990 TITO KINYAMBU.........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KAMSONS LIMITED.....................................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G This is an application by way of chamber summons under section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act for an order that the rate of interest awarded in the judgment for the sum of Kshs 65,000/- be compounded.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1534 OF 1997 FRANCIS MWANGI.......................................................PLAINTIFF versus SIMON K.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. 335 OF 1997 N W...........................................................APPLICANT versus M M.........................................................RESPONDENT R U L I N G There is a Divorce petition still pending for hearing between the parties herein, before the S.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU CIVIL APPEAL 130 OF 1996 CALISTUS OCHIENO OYALO suing as next friend 1. SYLIVIA OCHIENO OYALO 2.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 662 OF 1998 AHMED RASHID JIBRIL..............................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS EAST AFRICAN TELEVISION NETWORK LTD...........................................................1ST DEFENDANT SAM KRUSCHEV SHOLLEI........................................2ND DEFENDANT GLADYS BOSS SHOLLEI............................................3RD DEFENDANT AFRICA BROADCASTING LIMITED.........................4TH DEFENDANT WILFRED DA
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: SHAH J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: AKIWUMI, TUNOI & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 293 OF 1997 BETWEEN ELEGANT SERVICE STATION & GARAGE LIMITED .......................................APPELLANT AND KOBIL PETROLEUM LIMITED EXCELATHON LIMITED ..................................RESPONDENTS (An Appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Justice J.M.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
not able to proceed with the suit in the absence of the plaintiff, I dismiss the plaintiffs suit under order 1XB rule 4 of Civil Procedure Rules with costs to the defendant E. Njiru present 22.10.97 Mr.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, SHAH & PALL, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 292 OF 1997 BETWEEN SAMUEL NGURE GATHII.......................................APPELLANT AND JOSEPHINE WANJIRU MBUGUA................................RESPONDENT (Being an appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Hon.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 1557 OF 1996 KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK LTD......................................PLAINTIFF -versusIGNATIUS IRIGA NDERI.........................................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G The plaintiff sued the defendant claiming a sum of Kshs. 29,685,145.45 said to be monies paid by the plaintiff for and on behalf of and to the use of the defendant at the latter’s request.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Wamalwa & Company Advocates were not able to meet those requirements. They had to get the Order varied so that they can use another Bank.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1376 OF 1995 AHMED MEERA SHIAB DEEN.....................................PLAINTIFF versus MARY WANGUI..............................................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G The defendant/applicant has moved the court by way of Chamber Summons under Order 9A Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules for an order that the ex-parte judgment entered in default of defence on 19th March, 1996 be set aside and that she be al
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: LAKHA, PALL, JJ.A. & BOSIRE, AG.J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO.