Judgment[2002] KEHC 651
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 538 OF 2002 ABDUL GAFFOR…………………………………..PLAINTIFF VERSUS JAVID IQBAL MALIK…..………………………..DEFENDANT RULING By this application filed on 3rd October, 2002, the plaintiff who had earlier filed suit for taking accounts and profits due after taking accounts now seeks to have the defendants defence filed in that suit denying existence of any agreement between the parties by which he had allegedly borrowed shs 3,000,000/= towards
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. 116 OF 1993 GURDARSHAN SINGH ………………………..APPELLANT VERSUS C.K.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
plus interest, and costs of this suit and interest thereon also at the usual respective rates.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
plus interest, and costs of this suit and interest thereon also at the usual respective rates.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
superior court was as noted elsewhere in this judgment; the appeal arises out of two interlocutory orders made by the superior court on November 20, 2000. In addition to declining to join the companies in the Petition, the Commissioner acceded to the prayer to have and struck out the Petition.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU (CORAM: OMOLO, TUNOI & O’KUBASU JJ A ) CIVIL APPLICATION NO 51 OF 2001 BETWEEN ABRAHAM TENOI KIMALA................................APPLICANT AND JOB KIPSANG SUTER ......................................RESPONDENT RULING OF THE COURT This is a reference from the ruling of a learned single judge of this Court delivered on 25th September, 2001, whereby, in exercise of his powers under rule 4 of our rules, he refused to grant the applicant extension of time within