Judgment[2026] KECA 1078
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCase number Criminal Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Kamau v Republic High Court, at Nairobi August 29, 1985 Owuor J & Schofield J Criminal Appeal No 1236 of 1984 (Appeal from the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi, J A Mango, Esq) Advocates Appellant present and unrepresented W Nfugi (Miss) (State Counsel) for respondent August 29, 1985, Owuor J & Schofield J delivered the following Judgment. Bernard Mwangi Kamau appeals against his conviction by a learned senior resident magistrate Nairobi on 3 counts of robbery with
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVISION NO E106 OF 2021 ELIUD MWANIKI WAWERU.............................................................................1ST APPLICANT RAFIKI DEPOSIT TAKING MICROFINANCE (K) LTD.............................2ND APPLICANT VERSUS THE DIRECTORATE OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, KIAMBU....1STRESPONDENT THE NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE............................................................2ND RESPONDENT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GITHINJI, MWILU & ODEK, JJ.A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 54 OF 2015 BETWEEN ABDI YUSUF MAALIM …………………………………………………………………….APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………………………………………………………………………..……… RESPONDENT (An appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi, (Justice Muchemi) dated 19th December, 2013 in H.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL CASE NO.8 OF 2007 REPUBLIC…………………………………………………………..PROSECUTOR VERSUS WILLIAM KIPRONO TOWETT Alias NDUME….………..……….1ST ACCUSED WILLIAM KIPKURUI SITONIK……….………………....…………2ND ACCUSED RULING Both accused person are charged jointly that on 15th October, 2006 at Koita Village in Keringet, Molo they murdered Simon Nganga. They denied the offence and their trial commenced before Maraga, J (as he then was).
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: O’KUBASU, GITHINJI & NYAMU, JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 457 OF 2007 BETWEEN ABDULLAHI OSMAN MOHAMED........................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC..............................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Ombija, J.) dated 20th August, 2007 in H.C.CR.C.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL 36 OF 2008 ADBULHAKIM MOHAMED HASSAN HUSSEIN..............APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a conviction and sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Ombija, J.) dated 26th March, 2008 in H.C.Cr. 196 of 2003) ***************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Abdulhakim Mohamed Hassan Hussein, the appellant herein was arraigned in the superior c
Division and case type: CriminalCase number Criminal Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU Criminal Appli 133 of 2007 AHMED ALI……………………………....………APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………...RESPONDENT RULING The applicant, Ahmed Ali, was charged before the Naivasha Chief Magistrate’s Court with the offence of fraudulent false accounting contrary to Section 330 of the Penal Code. The value of the subject of the fraud was stated as Ksh.5,108,210/=.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU Criminal Appeal 44 & 45 of 2004 BENJAMINE NJOROGE KIMANI…………1ST APPELLANT BENSON ORWA MIDILA..…………………2ND APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………………………..…….RESPONDENT (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No.1451 of 2003 of the Senior resident Magistrate’s Court at R. Kirui, SRM) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The appellants were charged with the offence of robbery with violence contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code.
Division and case type: CriminalCase number Criminal Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Waweru v Republic High Court, at Nairobi August 14, 1985 Schofield J Criminal Appeal No 1723, 1724 & 1725 of 1984 (Appeal from the Resident’s Magistrate’ Court at Nairobi, J A Mango, Esq) Advocates Appellants absent, unrepresented, and not wishing to be present Miss W Ngugi, for respondent August 14, 1985, Schofield J delivered the following Judgment. Jackson Waweru (1st appellant), Francis Njoroge (2nd appellant) and Nelson Mwaniki (3rd appellant) were three of four accused
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 121 OF 2004 (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 214 OF 2002 GEORGE KAGUORA NDUATI……………………………..APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………………………..RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T The appellant had been charged for the offence of assault causing actual bodily harm contrary to Section 251 of the Penal Code.
Division and case type: CriminalMiscellaneous Criminal Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.567 OF 2003 FELIX MACHARIA MAGAWA........................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC..............................................................RESPONDENT RULING The applicant herein has applied to this Court for:- 1. Consolidation of Criminal Case No.1030 of 2003, Criminal Case No.1386 of 2003 and Criminal Case No.1387 of 2003, all preferred against him in Nairobi Chief Magistrate’s
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: LAKHA, BOSIRE & KEIWUA JJ.A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.120 OF 2002 BETWEEN CLEOPHAS ONYANGO OLAJO ...................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ..................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a judgement of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Mr. Oguk JJ.) dated 18th November 1997 in H.C.CR.A.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1214 OF 1998 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case no.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS CIVIL CASE NO. 1529 OF 2001 DEPOSIT PROTECTION BOARD (Suing as the Liquidator of Reliance Bank Ltd.) ……...
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
in the submission that the finding in fact has no evidence to support it, we have come to the conclusion that there is evidence on record capable of being taken into consideration to sustain the charge. There was overwhelming evidence of P.W.1., P.W.4 and P.W.5.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA 1 Barry Scutt & Another v Hitesh Jethwa & 2 Others High Court of Kenya at Nairobi June 29, 2000 Milimani Commercial Courts T Mbaluto, Judge Civil Case No 937 of 2000 June 29, 2000 T Mbaluto, Judge delivered the following ruling. This ruling relates to the issue as to who between the applicants who are the plaintiffs in this suit and the 3rd defendant/respondent should bear the costs of the application filed by the plaintiffs herein.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, SHAH & BOSIRE JJ.A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 27 OF 1999 BETWEEN FRED KIPCHUMBA CHEPKWONY...............................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC....................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a conviction and judgment of the High Court of Kenya in Embu (Mr.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: TUNOI J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: CriminalMiscellaneous Application
is Order VI rule 13(1) and an order under that provision is also equally appealable as of right under Order XLII rule 1. I am, therefore, satisfied that an appeal does lie in the instant case without leave from the decision of the Judge which is sought to be appealed against.