Judgment
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
…accounting not in themselves sufficient evidence – Evidence Act (cap 80) section 37 The appellants had been separately charged with two offences: fraudulent false accounting and stealing by a person employed in the public service…
…The receipts, however, did not show the specific purposes for which the money was paid and no evidence was led on what the prescribed fee was for the various services.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…The magistrate said that the appellant was identified at identification parades by Paresh and John Maina, a Tudor Security Service Guard who was on duty at the Inter-Fashions Factory at the relevant time.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…..........RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Kisumu, Schofield J) JUDGMENT The appellant was convicted by the Resident Magistrate at Kisumu of the offence of stealing Shs 14,500 by a person employed in the Public Service…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…..........RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Kisumu, Schofield J) JUDGMENT The appellant was convicted by the Resident Magistrate at Kisumu of the offence of stealing Shs 14,500 by a person employed in the Public Service…