Search court decisions

…......2ND APPLICANT VERSUS THE DIRECTORATE OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, KIAMBU....1STRESPONDENT THE NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE............................................................2ND RESPONDENT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS…

…If the prosecution wish to have the accused dealt with for other offences which are not charged, then the accused can be charged with those offences, or, semble in the High Court but not in the subordinate court, the accused…

…Further where the prosecution is in possession of evidence of trafficking (and the evidence is not to be led at the trial ) notice of it should be given to the defence, so that they have an opportunity to consider it and…

…The prosecution offered absolutely no explanation as to why they kept the appellant in custody for that long period and what they had been doing with her.…

…– they ie the prosecution, must prove that the length of the period for which the accused was in their custody had no effect on his making the statement.…

…This was never produced by the prosecution and the only logical observation is that it is because It was adverse to the prosecution case. If it was not, why conceal it from the court.…

…Yes, it was fatal to the prosecution case. It alleged that the appellant received Shs.50/- not 100/- as alleged in the charge or by the prosecution witnesses. She denied the charge.…

…I suppose it is fair to say that, if the money was in dollars and the appellant was expected to exchange them on the black-market, it would be unlikely that the prosecution witnesses would say so.…

…There was some substance in the account of the appellant which was to be negatived by the prosecution. On the evidence available, the appellant always said that someone had taken the money.…

…The grounds of appeal are briefly that the judge erred in confirming the conviction when the RM in his judgment had evaluated the evidence for the prosecution in isolation and failed to consider the unsworn statement, also…

…Thus the judge accepted the prosecution’s case and proceeded to dismiss the appeal. That is worse than commission of the error of looking separately at the case for the prosecution and the case for defence.…

…His argument before that Court was that the entire prosecution case against him was dependent on the alleged evidence of identification.…

…Without its consideration and findings made on it, the issue of the appellant’s correct identification remained unresolved, since that defence conflicted with the prosecution case in that connection.…

…Defence counsel was present from the commencement of the trial up to the close of the prosecution case but was absent on May 22, 1985 when the defence case opened.…

…Again and on his behalf, his counsel who was present throughout the presentation of the prosecution evidence, had cross-examined the prosecution witnesses as he saw it fit.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the complainant Philomena Wambui (PW 1) was travelling home in a matatu when the appellant snatched her handbag, wrist-watch and Kshs 2,150 cash.…

…The learned trial magistrate found the evidence of PW 1 and PW 2 truthful and found that the prosecution had proved its case to the degree required. He accordingly convicted the appellant as charged.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the complainant Philomena Wambui (PW 1) was travelling home in a matatu when the appellant snatched her handbag, wrist-watch and Kshs 2,150 cash.…

…The learned trial magistrate found the evidence of PW 1 and PW 2 truthful and found that the prosecution had proved its case to the degree required. He accordingly convicted the appellant as charged.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the complainant Philomena Wambui (PW 1) was travelling home in a matatu when the appellant snatched her handbag, wrist-watch and Kshs 2,150 cash.…

…The learned trial magistrate found the evidence of PW 1 and PW 2 truthful and found that the prosecution had proved its case to the degree required. He accordingly convicted the appellant as charged.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the complainant Philomena Wambui (PW 1) was travelling home in a matatu when the appellant snatched her handbag, wrist-watch and Kshs 2,150 cash.…

…The learned trial magistrate found the evidence of PW 1 and PW 2 truthful and found that the prosecution had proved its case to the degree required. He accordingly convicted the appellant as charged.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the accident was caused by the appellant in that he had driven at a high speed as well as on the wrong side of the road and also failed to brake in time to avoid hitting the deceased.…

…The prosecution of the appellant arose from an accident which occurred within Thika Municipality on 11.8.88.…

…The prosecution case against the appellant was that at about 5.30 am on December 11, 1983 he gave a Seiko wrist watch to a waitress named Mary Jane Akinyi Otieno at the Mirangi Day and Night club within the Nakuru District…

…Section 200 is not to be invoked where, as seemingly in the instant case, such a halfheard trial is a short one, it could be conveniently started de novo because the prosecution witnesses are still available locally, and…

…For our purpose here, the main complaint against the prosecution is non-compliance with (c), namely, failure by the prosecution to include certain documents, or exhibits in the committal bundles.…

…There is in the bundle a list of prosecution witnesses the prosecution intends to rely on and their addresses. We have included a list of exhibits and these number 301.…

…The complaint advanced on behalf of the appellant as we understood it is that the prosecution acted unfairly in adducing the medical evidence upon which the High Court adjudged that the appellant was mentally sick at the…

…The prosecution was required to prove intent and the nature of things the prosecution properly decided that it had become necessary to satisfy the court that the appellant was insane at the time he killed.…

…The prosecution evidence establishes the use of force and the unfortunate loss of the complainant’s husband. The thrust of the prosecution evidence is that the assailants were many in number.…

…Why did it take three days to arrest the appellant who was a neighbour and whose whereabouts it is said were well known to the prosecution witness?…

…The said principles include the nature of the charge or offence and the seriousness of the punishment to be imposed if the applicant is found guilty, the strength of the prosecution’s case, the character and the antecedents…

…of the accused and the likelihood that the applicant will interfere with the prosecution’s witnesses.…

…That charge, he alleges, arose in the performance of his duties as an advocate and according to him, before the prosecution could be started by the Attorney-General section 80 of the Advocates Act should have been complied…

…The proviso to that section is to the effect that no prosecution for an offence under that section shall be instituted unless a report has been made to the Attorney – General by the Disciplinary Committee created under the…