Search court decisions

…Eight witnesses altogether gave evidence at the trial that they recognised the second appellant.…

…He cited the case of Cleophas Otieno Wamunga v Republic (Criminal Appeal No 20 of 1989)where this Court said: “ It is trite law that where the only evidence against a defendant is evidence of identification or recognition…

…The evidence adduced was collaborated in material aspects by the evidence of an independent witness who was found by the magistrate to be honest and the evidence could therefore not be impeached. 2.…

…Mr Gatonye did not give hearsay evidence.…

…The paucity of evidence on the mental element was, made up by what is clearly hearsay evidence.…

…Accordingly, the evidence narrated to the court about what the informant told the police was inadmissible as hearsay evidence and ought to have been rejected by the trial court. That evidence was not excluded.…

…The evidence against the appellant was overwhelming as he was identified by the purchaser and an eyewitness to the theft. 2.…

…Then there was the evidence of Francis Lihanda alias Cisco (PW 19) who bought this lorry from the appellant in Western Kenya (Kisumu and Kakamega).…

…In view of the sketchy evidence of the eyewitnesses and the sketch plan, which seemed consistent with either version, the evidence of the turnboys was of importance and the magistrate should have given opportunity for the…

…The absence of such evidence materially prejudiced the appellant. 2.…

…There was no expert evidence to show what speed was implied by the 44.50 meter skid marks. 3.…

…At the point of the accident the road is straight and the evidence is that the weather was good. Further evidence by the motor vehicle examiner suggested that the appellants’s matatu did not have any preaccident defect.…

…The main ground in this appeal is on the confession statement which was retracted and repudiated and the corroborative evidence to make it admissible in evidence.…

…The link in the evidence leading to the blood-stain is missing and to rely on the bloodstain as corroborative evidence which evidence was not shown to have proved the guilt of the appellant would be unsafe.…

…As such they could not betaken as evidence against the other, even to the limited extent permitted by section 32 of the Evidence Act (cap 80).…

…30 of the Indian Evidence Act (now section 32 of cap 80).…

…The appellant’s contention in this appeal is on the grounds that the two courts below erred in law in not treating Mr Barlow’s evidence as that of an accomplice; the evidence of Samson Onyango (PW 2) was not impartial as…

…of PW 1 has been strongly corroborated by the evidence of PW 3, PW 5 and PW 7”.…

…The Evidence Act (section 124, cap 80).…

…of a child of tender years and had also overlooked significant items of evidence bearing on the reliability of her evidence the conviction could not stand.…

…The Evidence Act (section 124, cap 80).…

…of a child of tender years and had also overlooked significant items of evidence bearing on the reliability of her evidence the conviction could not stand.…

…It was submitted by counsel for the appellant that these witnesses (PW6 and PW7) were accomplices and it was not safe to convict on their evidence without the necessary caution or to act on such evidence without corroboration…

…There would however be no need for corroboration if the trial magistrate found their evidence as falling within the rare exception where the accomplice evidence is exceptionally cogent and credit worthy, in which case it…

…The appellant’s Memorandum of Appeal does not limit itself to those two grounds, namely that the conviction is against the weight of the evidence or that the sentence is excessive.…

…advocate, Mr Owuor, submitted one witness was an accomplice for which that Court of Appeal could find no evidence to support that submission.…

…As regards the evidence in support of the prosecution case the court below relied on the identification of the appellant by both PW 1 and PW 2.…

…The learned trial magistrate considered all the evidence before him and including the appellant’s defence and was satisfied on the basis of that evidence that it was the appellant who snatched the complainant’s property.…

…We now turn to a consideration of the particular evidence in the case of each appellant, bearing in mind as we do so the whole of the evidence.…

…It is said in the evidence of these witnesses that it was the home of the 2nd accused, but, apart from a report of what the 1st accused said, there is no other evidence upon which to base that allegation, and that evidence…

…There was no other evidence of any other kind whatever against the appellant.…

…The first ground of appeal that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction is a matter of law, though whether the evidence is sufficient (when there is some evidence) is a matter of fact: See R v T Mohamed…

…There was no other evidence of any other kind whatever against the appellant.…

…The first ground of appeal that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction is a matter of law, though whether the evidence is sufficient (when there is some evidence) is a matter of fact: See R v T Mohamed…

…The appellant raised seven grounds of appeal; that the last appellate court judges erred in law by failing to analyse and re-evaluate the entire evidence and find that there was no evidence to convict; by passing a conviction…

…That receipt allegedly given to the complainant when he bought the phone was never mentioned by the complainant in his evidence.…

…In contrast to the lapse of PW7’s evidence on identification listen to PW6’s evidence on the same point:- “I saw the young man shoot at the doctor. I saw the pistol the assailant had. The doctor ran inside a bureau.…

…In this regard, the investigating officer’s evidence concerning the recovered items was sufficiently corroborated by the evidence of Sgt. Rashid Ibrahim Ali PW9 and Pc. Edwin Kimaio PW10.…