Search court decisions

…Under cross-examination, PW 1 he identified Chacha at the parade but not during the robbery. All that meant that PW 2 was the sole identifying witness in so far as Chacha was concerned.…

…The second accused’s statement was not a confession nor was it evidence on oath which could be tested by cross-examination.…

…Neither witness was successfully challenged in cross-examination and we think that both the magistrate and the judge were entitled, and indeed right, to find on the complainant’s evidence, as so supported, that Kshs 105,000…