Search court decisions

…The prosecution case accepted by the two lower courts was that the house of Sister Wafula, a matron at Mr Elgon Hospital at Kitale was broken into on November 20, 1981, and six table chairs, two small tables, a fire place…

…The second accused’s evidence supported the prosecution’s case in a material respect. It undermined the appellant’s defence.…

…when but the appellant formed the opinion that his collegues had schemed against him and that consequently a crime had been committed so in 1986 the appellant went before the Chief Magistrate for permission for private prosecution…

…In the instant case, the appellant was pursuing a right to file a private prosecution. Only the Attorney-General has the right under section 26 of the Constitution to institute criminal proceedings.…

…officers found 15 rounds each, that his defence was rejected without sufficient or reasonable grounds, that the learned magistrate unjustifiably disallowed the evidence of his co-accused, which exonerated him, that the prosecution…

…In any event, the appellant was not charged with these suspects nor did circumstances require prosecution to call the suspects who may not have been charged with any offence unless there was a possibility raised that the…

…His conviction cannot be sustained as the prosecution was conducted by unauthorised public prosecutor, namely, Police Constable Mutisya. Conviction is quashed and sentence of two years and 4 strokes is set aside.…

…Jami prosecution counsel has served the appellants a Notice of enhancement of Sentence from fifteen (15) years to life imprisonment.…

…Otara: We had filed a motion which was served on the Director of Public Prosecution. Mr.…

…At the close of the prosecution case the appellant’s advocate told the court that the defence would be an alibi. The appellant made an unsworn statement in court.…

…Halima was called to testify for the prosecution. She was declared a hostile witness.…

…Kivihya appearing for the Director of Public Prosecutions opposing the appeal as one without merit submitted that the doctrine of recent possession was properly applied.…

…In the case of Arum v Republic, Court of Appeal at Kisumu Criminal Appeal no. 85 of 2005, it was held that the doctrine of recent possession is applicable where the court is satisfied that the prosecution have proved the…

…The prosecution case before the trial court was that the appellant made a document purporting it to be a sale agreement made and signed by one SALIM AWADH SULEIMAN, agreeing to sell his house at Chaani, Mombasa, to her at…

…The prosecution called evidence to show that a handwritten document which was exhibited may have been forged. A copy of the document was in the possession of the appellant.…

…It may also be observed that for a conviction to be had in offences involving sexual transgressions, the need for corroboraiton of the evidence of prosecution is essential.…

…During the course of the trial, the prosecution sought to adduce the cautionary statement of the appellant in evidence.…

…Being itself inadmissible, the confession of the 1st accused is of no assistance to the prosecution case.…

…The prosecution clearly showed contact with the vehicle by the 2nd accused at some time.…

…He accepted the evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses in full.…

…more important, to enable the accused to know the actual elements of the charge the prosecution is out to prove by the evidence it will be adducing.…

…iii) of the Act provides as follows: “185(d)(iii) Any person who acquires, has in his possession, …, any goods which he knows, or ought reasonably to have known to be uncustomed goods, shall be guilty of an offence …” The prosecution…

…The two lower courts found that the appellant was in possession of the goods on his own admission, and the prosecution proved that the goods in question were dutiable.…

…That was for the prosecution to prove. The blood-stain could have come from a person other than the deceased.…

…But in the court, the prosecution did not put forward any reason why the deceased’s blood must be on the back of the appellant’s shirt if indeed it was his shirt. Blood stains are circumstantial evidence.…

….…….. 3RD DEFENDANT RULING The three defendants herein have brought this application for an order that the suit filed against them by the defendant be dismissed for want of prosecution.…

…When he was faced with the same situation in the first application for dismissal for want of prosecution, Mulwa, J. declined to do so in the interests of justice because as he put it the dismissal would have affected numerous…

…However, the words of the appellant that he bought the shoes, the subject matter of the prosecution, from a market at Taita-Taveta, did not per se show the shoes were not uncustomed to his knowledge, and that he was an innocent…

…The circumstances under which he was arrested with them, and the fact that he admitted he was arrested as the prosecution alleged, clearly showed he had full knowledge of the offence he was charged with and knew what he was…

…It was alleged by the prosecution that he abused the complainant, an assistant chief of his area Mr Evan Nganga PW 1 and threatened to beat him.…

…There were two witnesses called for prosecution.…

…Although the witness said the gun found in the vehicle driven by the 3rd appellant was identical to one of those used in the robbery, he could not identify any of the robbers and obviously the prosecution knew there was insufficient…

…There were two witnesses called for prosecution.…

…Although the witness said the gun found in the vehicle driven by the 3rd appellant was identical to one of those used in the robbery, he could not identify any of the robbers and obviously the prosecution knew there was insufficient…

…The trial magistrate after outlining the evidence of the prosecution witness as stated that he believed their evidence but gave no reason for believing it apart from saying that they had nor reason for lying.…

…It was after the trial magistrate had considered and decided on the prosecution evidence, that he rejected the defences as false, again without giving any reasons.…