Judgment[2000] KEHC 236
JAMES IRUNGU MANYEKI v REPUBLIC
High Court at Machakos
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CRIM APP 175 OF 2000 JAMES IRUNGU MANYEKI ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT CONSOLIDATED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 174 OF 2000 PETER NJOROGE WAKABA ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT J U D G E M E N T These two appeals were consolidated and
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 104 OF 1999 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL DIVISION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1161 OF 2000 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.986 of 2000 of the District Magistrate’s at Kigumo). JOHN MAINA KAMAU......................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC........................................................................RESPONDENT CONSOLIDATED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1162 OF 2000 JOSPHAT MURANGA MBOTE........................................APPLICANT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA (CORAM: OMOLO, AKIWUMI & O'KUBASU, JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 83 OF 2000 BETWEEN BWANA KOMBO MUHATI ....................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA 1 Barry Scutt & Another v Hitesh Jethwa & 2 Others High Court of Kenya at Nairobi June 29, 2000 Milimani Commercial Courts T Mbaluto, Judge Civil Case No 937 of 2000 June 29, 2000 T Mbaluto, Judge delivered the following ruling. This ruling relates to the issue as to who between the applicants who are the plaintiffs in this suit and the 3rd defendant/respondent should bear the costs of the application filed by the plaintiffs herein.