Search court decisions

…His argument before that Court was that the entire prosecution case against him was dependent on the alleged evidence of identification.…

…Without its consideration and findings made on it, the issue of the appellant’s correct identification remained unresolved, since that defence conflicted with the prosecution case in that connection.…

…The trial Magistrate and the Judge erred in failing to hold that the prosecution had failed to dislodge the appellant’s cross-examination by the prosecution.…

…On the 4th October 1985, shortly before the prosecution put its show on the road, Mr Sereje who appeared for the defence before the trial Magistrate and before us gave the prosecution notice that the appellant’s case was…

…Defence counsel was present from the commencement of the trial up to the close of the prosecution case but was absent on May 22, 1985 when the defence case opened.…

…Again and on his behalf, his counsel who was present throughout the presentation of the prosecution evidence, had cross-examined the prosecution witnesses as he saw it fit.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the complainant Philomena Wambui (PW 1) was travelling home in a matatu when the appellant snatched her handbag, wrist-watch and Kshs 2,150 cash.…

…The learned trial magistrate found the evidence of PW 1 and PW 2 truthful and found that the prosecution had proved its case to the degree required. He accordingly convicted the appellant as charged.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the complainant Philomena Wambui (PW 1) was travelling home in a matatu when the appellant snatched her handbag, wrist-watch and Kshs 2,150 cash.…

…The learned trial magistrate found the evidence of PW 1 and PW 2 truthful and found that the prosecution had proved its case to the degree required. He accordingly convicted the appellant as charged.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the complainant Philomena Wambui (PW 1) was travelling home in a matatu when the appellant snatched her handbag, wrist-watch and Kshs 2,150 cash.…

…The learned trial magistrate found the evidence of PW 1 and PW 2 truthful and found that the prosecution had proved its case to the degree required. He accordingly convicted the appellant as charged.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the complainant Philomena Wambui (PW 1) was travelling home in a matatu when the appellant snatched her handbag, wrist-watch and Kshs 2,150 cash.…

…The learned trial magistrate found the evidence of PW 1 and PW 2 truthful and found that the prosecution had proved its case to the degree required. He accordingly convicted the appellant as charged.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the accident was caused by the appellant in that he had driven at a high speed as well as on the wrong side of the road and also failed to brake in time to avoid hitting the deceased.…

…The prosecution of the appellant arose from an accident which occurred within Thika Municipality on 11.8.88.…

…The prosecution case against the appellant was that at about 5.30 am on December 11, 1983 he gave a Seiko wrist watch to a waitress named Mary Jane Akinyi Otieno at the Mirangi Day and Night club within the Nakuru District…

…Section 200 is not to be invoked where, as seemingly in the instant case, such a halfheard trial is a short one, it could be conveniently started de novo because the prosecution witnesses are still available locally, and…

…For our purpose here, the main complaint against the prosecution is non-compliance with (c), namely, failure by the prosecution to include certain documents, or exhibits in the committal bundles.…

…There is in the bundle a list of prosecution witnesses the prosecution intends to rely on and their addresses. We have included a list of exhibits and these number 301.…

…The prosecution claimed that they had robbed one John Bwana Opundo of cash Kshs 6000. According to the prosecution, the complainant arrived from Bondo with a view to do some shopping in Kisumu. He has a shop there.…

…He held that the prosecution’s version of the matter was the side of truth and that the appellant and his confederates indeed robbed the complainant of his money.…

…The complaint advanced on behalf of the appellant as we understood it is that the prosecution acted unfairly in adducing the medical evidence upon which the High Court adjudged that the appellant was mentally sick at the…

…The prosecution was required to prove intent and the nature of things the prosecution properly decided that it had become necessary to satisfy the court that the appellant was insane at the time he killed.…

…The prosecution evidence establishes the use of force and the unfortunate loss of the complainant’s husband. The thrust of the prosecution evidence is that the assailants were many in number.…

…Why did it take three days to arrest the appellant who was a neighbour and whose whereabouts it is said were well known to the prosecution witness?…

…Ogada is that the evidence of the prosecution witness was contradictory.…

…He submitted that the alleged contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses were minor and did not affect the conviction.…

…The said principles include the nature of the charge or offence and the seriousness of the punishment to be imposed if the applicant is found guilty, the strength of the prosecution’s case, the character and the antecedents…

…of the accused and the likelihood that the applicant will interfere with the prosecution’s witnesses.…

…B.Ombewa) found that the prosecution had provided its case with sufficient and reliable evidence to convict the appellant with the offence of defilement.…

…which evidence did not prove the prosecution’s case beyond reasonable grounds; and in upholding a sentence which was excessive.…

…The Court took the view that the prosecution’s failure to call those two suspects as witnesses raised the inevitable presumption that had they been called they would have given evidence unfavourable to the prosecution’s case…

…This raised the inevitable presumption that witnesses if called would have given unfavourable evidence against the prosecution. This failure on the part of the prosecution was fatal to the conviction.…

…He submitted that the summing up by the Judge Advocate was one sided and concentrated mainly on the prosecution's case.…

…The prosecution demonstrated that the Applicant was recalled to Nanyuki Barracks because he did not have the qualifications to handle push up duties.…

…He submitted that the summing up by the Judge Advocate was one sided and concentrated mainly on the prosecution's case.…

…The prosecution demonstrated that the Applicant was recalled to Nanyuki Barracks because he did not have the qualifications to handle push up duties.…