Search court decisions

…In his oral submissions to the court the first appellant Boniface Mutinda Muema submitted that the complainant claimed that he was injured but there was no evidence from the Doctor to prove the same that he was injured, he…

…This court directed the Counsel for the parties to make oral submissions. Mr. Magolo admitted that they had indeed filed High Court Constitutional Petition No. 50 of 2020 before Judge E. Ogola and that it was dismissed.…

…We agree with counsel for the first and second respondents in his submission that the issue as to whether a Court of law has jurisdiction to entertain a matter before it, is not one of mere procedural technicality; it goes…

…The appellant put in written submissions, on May 9, 2022. The respondent did not submit, Ms. Challa invited the court to allocate a date for judgment. 9. I will consider the grounds of appeal sequentially. 10.…

…The appellant put in written submissions, on May 9, 2022. The respondent did not submit, Ms. Challa invited the court to allocate a date for judgment. 9. I will consider the grounds of appeal sequentially. 10.…

…The appellant put in written submissions, on May 9, 2022. The respondent did not submit, Ms. Challa invited the court to allocate a date for judgment. 9. I will consider the grounds of appeal sequentially. 10.…

…The appellant put in written submissions, on May 9, 2022. The respondent did not submit, Ms. Challa invited the court to allocate a date for judgment. 9. I will consider the grounds of appeal sequentially. 10.…

…If at the close of evidence in support of the charge, and after hearing such summing up, submissions or arguments as the prosecutor and the accused person or his advocate may wish to put forward, it appears to the court that…

…“S.211.(1) At the close of the evidence in support of the charge, and after hearing such summing up, submission or argument as may be put forward, if it appears to the court that a case is made out against the accused person…

…Mr Prinja made submissions on 15 grounds of appeal on behalf of Anupchand and 13 for Vijay and Mr Metha replied to them for the Republic, and we are grateful to them for all the work and addition they have brought to bear…

…Here, in this case, after carefully considering all the arguments and submissions on both sides, and our own evaluation of the evidence adduced at the trial, we are left with no reasonable doubt Anupchand and Vijay were properly…

…Their appeals are poorly put forward and we have considered that they have repeated Mr Ghalia’s submissions.…

…In his petition of appeal and in his submissions both written and oral, the main point taken up by the appellant is that he was framed in these charges by the police and that the learned magistrate erred in not believing…