Search court decisions

…The case for the prosecution was that the complainant Philomena Wambui (PW 1) was travelling home in a matatu when the appellant snatched her handbag, wrist-watch and Kshs 2,150 cash.…

…The learned trial magistrate found the evidence of PW 1 and PW 2 truthful and found that the prosecution had proved its case to the degree required. He accordingly convicted the appellant as charged.…

…For the prosecution case to succeed, it was incumbent upon the prosecution to prove that each and every averment of fact contained in the affidavit of the appellant complained of was false and in particular as regards of…

…When the trial magistrate find that there was no clear evidence asto the falsely in his affidavit then that was sufficient to entitle the appellant to be acquitted as the onus was on the prosecution to prove its case beyond…

…Firstly, on the basis of the charge being defective, yet neither the prosecution nor the court amended it.…

…Masila, Prosecution Counsel, relied on the grounds of opposition filed by the DPP’s Office.…

…Criminal Law – false pretence – charge of procuring registration of land by false pretences - Penal Code (cap 63) section 320 - whether prosecution for the offence can be brought after lapse of a long time – section 219 Criminal…

…The appellant’s main ground of appeal was that neither the trial magistrate nor the learned first appellate judge gave any or adequate consideration to the discrepancies and conflicts in the evidence of the several prosecution…

…The learned Judge sat with three assessors and he heard all the eleven witnesses called by the prosecution in support of its case. After listening to the submissions of the appellant’s then advocate Mr.…

…No summing-up notes were available on the record and the incoming Judge deprived the appellant and of course himself of the opinion of the two assessors who had at least seen and heard the prosecution witnesses and the appellant…

…In his petition of appeal the main grounds of complaint are that the learned trial magistrate disregarded his defence; that she convicted him on the basis of conflicting prosecution evidence; that the police officer who arrested…

…It will perhaps be appropriate to set out a summary of the prosecution case as it emerged in the court below.…

…The prosecution reproduced the facts which the appellant admitted as true. It was said that he had no previous convictions.…

…) The prosecutor reproducing the facts constituting the offence. iv) The accused being asked and admitting whether they are true or not. v) Recording the response and entering a plea of guilty on facts admitted. vi) The prosecution…

…The prosecution evidence establishes the use of force and the unfortunate loss of the complainant’s husband. The thrust of the prosecution evidence is that the assailants were many in number.…

…Why did it take three days to arrest the appellant who was a neighbour and whose whereabouts it is said were well known to the prosecution witness?…

…The said principles include the nature of the charge or offence and the seriousness of the punishment to be imposed if the applicant is found guilty, the strength of the prosecution’s case, the character and the antecedents…

…of the accused and the likelihood that the applicant will interfere with the prosecution’s witnesses.…

…That would lend weight to the prosecution’s contention that the applicant is likely to interfere with the investigations.…

…I refuse this application and order it dismissed and if Mr Aluoch for the applicant is so inclined, he and the prosecution can have the case mentioned before the trial magistrate with a view to getting earlier hearing dates…

…He submitted that the summing up by the Judge Advocate was one sided and concentrated mainly on the prosecution's case.…

…The prosecution demonstrated that the Applicant was recalled to Nanyuki Barracks because he did not have the qualifications to handle push up duties.…

…B.Ombewa) found that the prosecution had provided its case with sufficient and reliable evidence to convict the appellant with the offence of defilement.…

…which evidence did not prove the prosecution’s case beyond reasonable grounds; and in upholding a sentence which was excessive.…

…The trial magistrate after outlining the evidence of the prosecution witness as stated that he believed their evidence but gave no reason for believing it apart from saying that they had nor reason for lying.…

…It was after the trial magistrate had considered and decided on the prosecution evidence, that he rejected the defences as false, again without giving any reasons.…

…In his grounds of appeal to the High court the appellant complained that the prosecution evidence against him was fabricated lies and unreliable.…

…The key prosecution witnesses were Richard Ng’eno (PW 1) and Peter Munyao (PW 2). Richard was supposed to be the one who saw the appellant lock himself in the toilet and then he called Peter.…

…By the application of the doctrine the burden shifts from the prosecution to the accused to explain his possession of the item complained about.…

…He can only be asked to explain his possession after the prosecution have proved certain basic facts.…

…That charge, he alleges, arose in the performance of his duties as an advocate and according to him, before the prosecution could be started by the Attorney-General section 80 of the Advocates Act should have been complied…

…The proviso to that section is to the effect that no prosecution for an offence under that section shall be instituted unless a report has been made to the Attorney – General by the Disciplinary Committee created under the…

…It was the prosecution case that at the material time being 1 pm of 12th December, 1989 PW 1 who was the herdsboy for all the animals charged as robbed from him, took the herd and flock of sheep to water.…

…In the ultimate this Court is left in enormous doubt as to the quality of the prosecution evidence against the appellant.…

…It was the prosecution case that at the material time being 1 pm of 12th December, 1989 PW 1 who was the herdsboy for all the animals charged as robbed from him, took the herd and flock of sheep to water.…

…In the ultimate this Court is left in enormous doubt as to the quality of the prosecution evidence against the appellant.…

…Mr Prinja, in arguing grounds 5 and 6 of his appeal, alleged that the judge had considered the cases of the prosecution and of the defence in isolation to each other and had first accepted the evidence adduced by the prosecution…

…The learned judge set out the case for both the prosecution and the defence in some detail.…