Search court decisions

…He denied in cross-examination that he had never alleged any beatings in his police statement which he made on the date he was arrested.…

…In cross examination he added that the persons who beat Abdi were different from those who beat him and the second plaintiff, and they were three. According to him also, there were five askaris who beat them.…

…Mr Chemweno on the other hand was not traced for cross-examinations.…

…assertions of Mr Chebseba on record given in his cross examination intact and unchallenged.…

…During cross-examination the plaintiff explained that on that fateful evening Lawi appeared from behind him and held his waist, then the two fell down and the fore-man came to separate them.…

…The witness said that Lawi had hit several other people before, and on cross examination he said: “That night, Lawi was drank because of the way he was talking. He was harsh to the people.…

…In cross examination, PW1 claried that the deceased had come home with the appellant on 20th December, 2010.…

…In cross examination, the appellant did not challenge PW2’s testimony on how she came to live in the deceased’s house and the fact that she was in the deceased house on the material night when the deceased was killed.…

…In cross examination, PW1 claried that the deceased had come home with the appellant on 20th December, 2010.…

…In cross examination, the appellant did not challenge PW2’s testimony on how she came to live in the deceased’s house and the fact that she was in the deceased house on the material night when the deceased was killed.…

…In cross examination, PW1 claried that the deceased had come home with the appellant on 20th December, 2010.…

…In cross examination, the appellant did not challenge PW2’s testimony on how she came to live in the deceased’s house and the fact that she was in the deceased house on the material night when the deceased was killed.…

…On cross-examination by Mr Satchu, Mr Sherwin stated that the bucket would drop to the surface of the road.…

…On cross-examination by court, he stated that he traveled a distance of about 100 yards on the right lane before the steering turned right.…

…Counsel for the respondent on the other hand opposed the appeal on the following grounds: (1) That they obtained leave before filing the suit and the appellants did not by either evidence submissions or even cross examination…

…In my opinion having given the particulars of the file where leave was sought if the appellant defendant was not satisfied with that he should have sought particulars and called for evidence in cross examination.…

…One is even constrained to think that the cross-examination conducted by defence counsel was never based on instructions from his clients.…

…It must be remembered that it is made in the absence of the accused and is not subjected to cross-examination.…

…In cross examination Wayua answered that although she did not have a spotlight, on thatcloudless full moon night she saw clearly the incident in issue.…

…In cross examination PW2 told the court that his house and that of the accused lie opposite each other across the road. But the scene of the attack was closer to the accused's house.…

…He said in cross examination that appellant had lOUs to present. He also said that documents relating to IOUs were not produced in court and the bank statements were not attached to the audit report.…

…In cross examination he said he was not availed any payment vouchers and did not investigate their petty cash account.…

…He said in cross examination that appellant had lOUs to present. He also said that documents relating to IOUs were not produced in court and the bank statements were not attached to the audit report.…

…In cross examination he said he was not availed any payment vouchers and did not investigate their petty cash account.…

…The cross-examination of the process server by Mr Otieno for the defendants did not show anything substantial from which this Court could conclude that the process server was lying.…

…But if the fact of service is denied, it is desirable that the process server should be put into the witness box and opportunity of cross-examination given to those who deny the service.”…

…The plaintiff categorically exculpated the 1st defendant when he said (in cross-examination by Mr Gikandi): “It is not true that I was employed by the 1st defendant as alleged in paragraph 5 of the plaint.…

…In cross-examination by Mr Pandya the 1st defendant admitted that the person who completed the first form was his own clerk who was paying wages to his employees, and that although he knew that the clerk had completed this…

…He said so in his evidence in chief and repeated it when the matter was raised in cross examination. The evidence of PW3 is very clear.…

…In his evidence in court the first accused Charles Ndolo who is appellant in HCCRA 52/03 said that he had a grudge with the complainant which he never put to the complainant in cross examination.…

…The issue of a grudge has been displaced by this court as being an after thought as it was not in cross examinations. Even if PW 1 had a grudge no explanation exists as to why PW 2 and 3 should frame the appellants.…

…In his evidence in chief he did not say he led the Police to the arrest of any of the Appellants but during cross-examination he said he had identified Accused One to the Police. He does not say where and how.…

…During cross-examination, he denied shouting that the deceased was a thief and repeated that the evidence of PW1 was false.…

…In the case giving rise to this appeal PW1 said during cross-examination:- “Deceased and accused are my customers” And during re-examination he said “Both deceased and accused were my friends.”…