Search court decisions

….……………………………… DEFENDANT RULING Application to set aside dismissal orders of the Court Chamber Summons dated 10 th December, 2008 I: Background 1. The parties herein are related to each other as step-brothers.…

…Together with the plaint the plaintiffs filed a chamber summons dated 1.3.2004 under order 39 Rule 2(1), (2) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Rules, Rules 12(5) and (7) of the Children’s Act (No. 8 of 2001) General Rules and…

…I shall first of all deal with the issue of competence of the application which has been brought by way of chamber summons under Order 41 Rule 4 of the Civil procedure Rules. In his reply to Mr.…

…In paragraph 7 of the affidavit sworn by the defendant’s manager in reply to the present chamber summons seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendant from selling this particular vehicle to anyone else pending…

…By the Chamber Summons filed under order XXXIX rules 1, 2, 3, 9, the plaintiff seeks the order restraining the “defendant from constructing any building upon any portion of the land being plot No 1068 IMN belonging to the…

…On the same day, August 10, 1984 that the plaint was filed, a chamber summons was filed seeking a vacation hearing for an interlocutory injunction to restrain the First Defendant from parting with the proceeds of the sale…

…The Plaintiff now went to work and produced a plaint, a chamber summons applying for an injunction, with affidavit in support, all dated July 18, 1984 but not filed until July 20. The suit was numbered 2016 of 1984.…

…Yet there is no doubt that it was a chamber summons and not a notice of motion.…

….…………..RESPONDENTS RULING This application is brought by Chamber Summons under Order IXB rule 8 and O XXI rule 22 Civil Procedure Rules. The applicants are the defendants in the suit.…

…On 16th May, 1989 an application by Chamber Summons was filed. It was expressed to be brought under O IXB rule 8 Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of Civil Procedure Act. Two orders were prayed for.…

…On the same day, the plaintiff took out a chamber summons under Order 39 r. 1 and r. 2 for orders that the defendant be restrained from selling title Kiine/Rukanga/408 and from applying for consent of the Divisional Land…

…The plaintiff/applicant has filed chamber summons under order VI rule 13(b) and c and order IXA rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking orders that the defence filed herein be struck out as the same is scandalous, frivolous…

…essence of finding 16 (Supra) was equally stressed, But. while by 16th December 1998, the Appellants had by notice of motion applied to this court to confirm the SUPKEM award as its judgement, the Plaintiffs had by an earlier chamber…

…summons of 1st April 1998 which was withdrawn and replaced with one dated 29th January 1999 sought this court's orders to set aside the said award on the grounds Mr, Kilonzi argued that the arbitrators had misconducted themselves…

…This was on August 5, 1982 and on September 17, the same year the learned judge heard Gathigia’s application by Chamber Summons dated August 20, 1982 asking him to set aside that award under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure…

…It was this judgment that was sought to be set aside by the superior court in a Chamber Summons taken out by the respondent herein under Order IXA rule 10 and Order IXB rules 4 and 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules and all the…

…The plaintiff, who is the applicant, moved the court by chamber summons grounded on Order VI Rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Rules, seeking orders that the defence filed herein be struck out, and costs of the application be…

…He seeks to challenge the application on a number of grounds as shown in his chamber summons dated 26th of October, 1992. Those grounds are:- 1.…

…By a chamber summons under Order 39 rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules the respondent sought an order for injunction against the appellant to restrain it from in any way interfering with the quiet enjoyment and possession…

….….........PLAINTIFF VERSUS DESANUO & 13 OTHERS……………………………………DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiff The Da Gama Rose Group of Companies Limited, has made an application by way of Chamber Summons under order XXXIX rules 2 and 3 of…

…The respondent should pay the appellant’s costs in this court, the High Court and the resident magistrate’s court relating to the application under order IXB rule 8 originating by the chamber summons of April, 1983.…

…Alongside the said plaint he filed an application by way of Chamber Summons for Injunctory orders. Upon that application the Exparte order aforesaid was obtained.…