Search court decisions

…She set out the well known principle of circumstantial evidence which the Court of Appeal in SEMEON MBELLE V. R, CR. AP.…

…As was held in the court of appeal case of Kiilu & Another vs.…

…As was held in the court of appeal case of Kiilu & Another vs.…

…As was held in the court of appeal case of Kiilu & Another vs.…

…the case of Robert Kinuthia Munqai Vs Republic wherethe Appellant shot the deceased younger man who was violent inorder to immobilise him and the plea of defence of the person andprevention of a felony was upheld by the Court…

…of Appeal.…

…the case of Robert Kinuthia Munqai Vs Republic wherethe Appellant shot the deceased younger man who was violent inorder to immobilise him and the plea of defence of the person andprevention of a felony was upheld by the Court…

…of Appeal.…

…For example, the Court of Appeal in CMC Holdings Ltd vs Nzioki [2004] KLR 173 held; “In an application for setting aside ex parte judgment, the Court exercises its discretion in allowing or rejecting the same.…

…IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram:Platt, Gachuhi & Apaloo JJA) CRIMINAL APPEAL 8 & 19 OF 1986 BETWEEN MAINA & 3 OTHERS ..............................................APPELLANTS AND REPUBLIC..........................…

…The court allowed the appeal of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th appellants on counts 1, 3 and 4 quashed their convictions and set aside their sentences.…

…1993) (Judgment) King Woolen Mills Ltd (formerly known as Manchester Outfitters Suiting Division Ltd & another v M/s Kaplan & Straton Advocates [1993] eKLR Neutral citation: [1993] KECA 57 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT…

…OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL 55 OF 1993 MG MULI, JA DECEMBER 16, 1993 BETWEEN KING WOOLEN MILLS LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MANCHESTER OUTFITTERS SUITING DIVISION LTD) ..................................... 1ST APPELLANT…

…The High Court does so exercising its own discretion and there is no provision whatever for appeal of any kind either to another judge or to the Court of Appeal.…

…IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Cockar, Omolo & Akiwumi JJ A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 115 OF 1991 GICHANGA ……………….….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………..RESPONDENT (Appeal from a conviction and sentence judgment order or…

…It follows that there is no right of appeal to this Court on a matter of fact or what is regarded as such.…

…It is not clear whether or not the 1st accused in the lower court appealed.…

…The facts of the case as I understand them are as follows:- That on 21.10.1998 at about 6 p.m. four anti-narcotic Police Officers on a tip-off, went to Likoni where they had gotten information drugs were being sold.…

…In the case of Rex v Okute s/o Kaliembi and Gadimba s/o Oumo (1941) Vol VII Eastern African Court of Appeals Report p 78, the first appellant and the accused persons who had not appealed had on arresting the deceased taken…

…The learned Judges of the Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa left it open to the Crown to take such proceedings against the first appellant and against the other accused, who had not appealed but had had their conviction…

…Nevertheless the Court of Appeal Judges in Manyenye’s case and the High Court Judges in Koinange Mbiu’s case, decided that no prejudice had been caused by the omissions.…

…The court of Appeal in Kamau v Rep [1975] EA 139 at p 140 quoted from Abdalla bin Wendo v R (1953) 20 EACA 166:- “Subject to certain exceptions it is trite law that a fact may be proved by the testimony of a single witness…