Judgment
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…’s process The plaintiff filed a plaint, and simultaneously filed an injunction application on 23rd June 2003.…
…The 1st defendant in their supporting affidavit depone that, “….the plaintiff’s conduct amounts to an abuse of the court’s process; that the plaintiff’s conduct greatly prejudices the 1st defendant who is unable to exercise…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
…It seeks to stop the prosecution of the petition and its striking out for being frivolous, vexatious, an abuse of the court process and meant to embarrass the company.…
…It is contended by the petitioner that the application be struck out as a sham and abuses the court process. As the goods were supplied in 1996 to 1997, the company does not show liability has ever been disputed.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Suit
…That the powers under that Section are used for the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse of the court process.…
…Plaintiffs counsel said the application is mischievous and is an abuse of the court process for it seeks to deny the plaintiff remedy against the other defendants.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
…The application was an abuse of the court process and intended to embarrass this Honourable court; ii.…
…His finding was that institution of the present application for revision when Constitutional Petition No. 50 of 2020 was subsisting was an abuse of the court process.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Suit
…Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act gives this court inherent powers to make such orders as may be necessary for ends of justice to be met or to prevent abuse of the process of the court.…
…The power to strike out proceedings for abuse of court process is discretionary. In this case, the abuse complained of was beyond Plaintiff/Respondent’s control.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsJudicial Review
…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…
…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…More importantly there was already on the record an application by the Respondents dated 1st August 2006, seeking to strike out the suit on the grounds the same was frivolous, vexatious and otherwise an abuse of the Court…
…process.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…More importantly there was already on the record an application by the Respondents dated 1st August 2006, seeking to strike out the suit on the grounds the same was frivolous, vexatious and otherwise an abuse of the Court…
…process.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsElection Petition
…The Court had this to say “throwing a bundle of court documents to a party to be served with them does not constitute proper service of court process. It would be ridiculous to extend the rule to that limit”.…