KHIMJI'S SECONDHAND MART v TABURA SECURITY AGENCY
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…In order to prove that a theft had occurred, all the Plaintiffrequired to do is to produce the lower court file under section 34 of the Evidence Act.…
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…No doubt, this pleading aimed at reliance on section 47A of the Evidence Act (cap 80); but the theft by Moses Aila is not denied as such by the second respondent.…
…The plaintiff alleged that Moses Aila an employee of the second defendant stole the plaintiff’s goods (and his conviction would be conclusive proof under section 47A of the Evidence Act (cap 80)), and that this theft occurred…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…In order to prove that a theft had occurred, all the Plaintiffrequired to do is to produce the lower court file under section 34 of the Evidence Act.…